Frame Report After 12K miles

Ask questions about Harbor Freight trailers, or questions about building your own...

Frame Report After 12K miles

Postby SteveH » Tue Sep 26, 2006 1:42 pm

Way back in November of '04 when I started building my trailer, I reported in this thread: http://tnttt.com/viewto ... highlight= I was building the frame from 2" X 1/4" angle iron. There were several folks on the forum that had...lets just say they had lots of "concerns" about the strength of an angle iron frame. I am happy to report that after almost two years of use and over 12,000 miles of travel, there have been absolutely zero issues with the frame, or any other part of the teardrop structure, for that matter. I am here to testify that 2" angle is plenty strong for the frame of a teardrop trailer, again IMHO.
SteveH
Calling an illegal alien an "undocumented immigrant"is like calling a drug dealer an "unlicensed pharmacist ".
User avatar
SteveH
2000 Club
2000 Club
 
Posts: 2101
Images: 42
Joined: Mon Nov 01, 2004 8:28 am
Location: Bexar Co, TX

Postby madjack » Tue Sep 26, 2006 4:49 pm

...that is good to hear Steve...during my time here, I have come to believe that we severely overbuild our frames...a frame such as on Mikes UltraLite or Freds new AlaskaLite design, is more in line with what we are building....
madjack 8)
...I have come to believe that, conflict resolution, through violence, is never acceptable.....................mj
User avatar
madjack
Site Admin
 
Posts: 15128
Images: 177
Joined: Thu Dec 02, 2004 5:27 pm
Location: Central Louisiana

Postby SteveH » Wed Sep 27, 2006 6:44 am

Yes Jack, and after seeing a CampInn frame a year or so ago, even my frame is about four times as strong (read HEAVY) as it needs to be.

By the way, if anyone is interested, there are pictures of my frame in my album.
SteveH
Calling an illegal alien an "undocumented immigrant"is like calling a drug dealer an "unlicensed pharmacist ".
User avatar
SteveH
2000 Club
2000 Club
 
Posts: 2101
Images: 42
Joined: Mon Nov 01, 2004 8:28 am
Location: Bexar Co, TX
Top

Postby bledsoe3 » Wed Sep 27, 2006 7:00 am

Thanks for that update. IF I ever build another, I'll be doing it lighter.
If you do what you've always done, you'll get what you've always got.
User avatar
bledsoe3
3000 Club
3000 Club
 
Posts: 3694
Images: 112
Joined: Tue Jun 07, 2005 5:55 am
Location: Oregon, Portland
Top

Postby angib » Wed Sep 27, 2006 10:50 am

SteveH wrote:Yes Jack, and after seeing a CampInn frame a year or so ago, even my frame is about four times as strong (read HEAVY) as it needs to be.

Can anyone say that the Camp-Inn frame is definitely 2" x 2" x 1/8" angle? And can someone say what the distance is from the front of the body to the centre of the ball?

I seem to remember Cary saying they once had a 3/16" thick option for 'off-road' use - but that infomation has travelled through the filter of my memory....

Andrew
User avatar
angib
5000 Club
5000 Club
 
Posts: 5783
Images: 231
Joined: Fri Apr 30, 2004 2:04 pm
Location: (Olde) England
Top

Postby SteveH » Wed Sep 27, 2006 12:45 pm

Andrew,

I've seen the CampInn frame, and yes, it is definately 2" X 2" X 1/8" angle, and it has a very minimal number of cross members...like two if I remember right. The V tongue, also angle, is butt welded on at the junction of the side pieces and the front cross member.
SteveH
Calling an illegal alien an "undocumented immigrant"is like calling a drug dealer an "unlicensed pharmacist ".
User avatar
SteveH
2000 Club
2000 Club
 
Posts: 2101
Images: 42
Joined: Mon Nov 01, 2004 8:28 am
Location: Bexar Co, TX
Top

Postby jdarkoregon » Wed Sep 27, 2006 11:57 pm

SteveH

Thanks for the report, When I build a single axle tear, it will be light and your information about the material of the frame will be very comforting.

thanks again

John ;)
Innovation is essential
The world can be better
ImageImage
User avatar
jdarkoregon
Donating Member
 
Posts: 1236
Images: 47
Joined: Mon Aug 22, 2005 7:07 pm
Location: Oregon, Sublimity
Top

Postby angib » Thu Sep 28, 2006 12:00 pm

One comment I'd make on Steve's frame is to point out that he's using 2"x2"x1/4" angle - and this is twice as strong as 2"x2"x1/8" angle. We don't want anyone to go thinking that all 2" angles are the same.

It's also worth adding that the 2"x2"x1/4" angle Steve is using is actually heavier than the 2"x2"x1/8" square tube that other folks have used.

As well as what it's made from, the length of the tongue matters a lot in its strength - the longer the tongue, the stronger it needs to be.

Andrew
User avatar
angib
5000 Club
5000 Club
 
Posts: 5783
Images: 231
Joined: Fri Apr 30, 2004 2:04 pm
Location: (Olde) England
Top

Postby Cary Winch » Thu Sep 28, 2006 2:29 pm

Andrew,

Your memory is not as filled with cobwebs as you think. We did have a extreme off road frame that was 3/16" thick. But it was also 2 1/2" x 2 1/2" angle rather than 2". Those were very heavy and very strong. Otherwise we use the 2 x 2 x 1/8". The Raindrop is a different beast though, we add in tensional members to give it some box strength. Just steel rod and is a great light weight solution. You'll have to see on some time.

Cary
User avatar
Cary Winch
Teardrop Manufacturer
 
Posts: 484
Images: 1
Joined: Thu May 27, 2004 8:06 pm
Location: Necedah Wis.
Top

Postby alaska teardrop » Thu Sep 28, 2006 2:50 pm

    It might also be pointed out that the 2"x2"x1/8" sq. tube is about 2 1/2 times stronger than the 2"x2"x1/4" angle. And that it allows more end area for stronger less flexible welds.
    Like others, I designed my first TD before coming upon Mike's T&TTT and had searched for some kind of chassis standards without success. Although I can say that the overall trailer is light, the frame could have been considerably lighter.
    So, thankyou Mike, Paul & Andrew. We now have a realistic way of comparison and design standard. :applause: :thumbsup:
Northern Lite Traveler design: viewtopic.php?f=27&t=51991
Minimalist torsion axle frame: viewtopic.php?f=35&t=12220
Alaska Teardrop photo gallery: http://tnttt.com/gallery/album.php?album_id=2014
Glampette photo gallery; gallery/album.php?album_id=2983&sk=t&sd=d&st=0
User avatar
alaska teardrop
Platinum Donating Member
 
Posts: 1112
Images: 177
Joined: Wed Aug 24, 2005 1:41 pm
Location: Greenville, Michigan
Top

Postby bledsoe3 » Thu Sep 28, 2006 11:33 pm

Cary Winch wrote:Andrew,

Your memory is not as filled with cobwebs as you think. We did have a extreme off road frame that was 3/16" thick. But it was also 2 1/2" x 2 1/2" angle rather than 2". Those were very heavy and very strong. Otherwise we use the 2 x 2 x 1/8". The Raindrop is a different beast though, we add in tensional members to give it some box strength. Just steel rod and is a great light weight solution. You'll have to see on some time.

Cary

Cary, That's 2" X 2" X 1/8" angle right?
If you do what you've always done, you'll get what you've always got.
User avatar
bledsoe3
3000 Club
3000 Club
 
Posts: 3694
Images: 112
Joined: Tue Jun 07, 2005 5:55 am
Location: Oregon, Portland
Top

Postby Cary Winch » Fri Sep 29, 2006 9:00 am

Yup, that is angle.

Cary
User avatar
Cary Winch
Teardrop Manufacturer
 
Posts: 484
Images: 1
Joined: Thu May 27, 2004 8:06 pm
Location: Necedah Wis.
Top

Postby TRAIL-OF-TEARS » Mon Oct 02, 2006 3:20 pm

Sorry to respond so late. But we just got back from a 2000 mile trip to Colorado. I have about 9000 miles on my tear and it was built with 2x2x1/4" angle set up very close to the Camp-Inn style. This trip the tear was very heavily loaded about 1600lbs total and most of the weight was in front of the axle. I am happy to report we had no problems on this trip.
Steve J.

Image
Home built Camp-Inn clone.
GO SPURS GO
User avatar
TRAIL-OF-TEARS
Donating Member
 
Posts: 854
Images: 41
Joined: Tue Sep 21, 2004 11:09 am
Location: Spring Branch, Texas (north of San Antonio)
Top


Return to Trailer and Chassis Secrets

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 13 guests