by Squigie » Sun Mar 22, 2020 11:27 am
That's great for you.
We all have our preferences.
I'd rather have a roof that sheds weight and water, than one that collects it.
There's more to it than just potential leaks, too.
Case in point:
My current tent trailer, again, has had three axle failures in its lifetime, while in possession of the previous owners.
It wasn't even moving for one of the failures.
It was overloaded during one of our excessively snowy winters.
2,000 lb Flex-ride axle (rubber 'spring' torsion axle)
1,536 lb dry weight (rated for 1,836 lb gross)
38" of slowly-accumulated snow on the 126"x81" roof -- that is, even by conservative estimates, in excess of 2,000 lbs of snow. (Likely over 3,000 lb.)
The rubber torsion 'springs' tore, releasing the spindle arms, and the trailer settled until the spindle arms stopped on the frame ... with the tires breaking through the floor and wheel well covers.
The 2,000 lb axle had somewhere north of at least 3,500 lbs on it (likely 4,500+ lbs), simply because the roof doesn't shed snow or ice.
If I don't clear the roof off during the winter, by the time there's about 18" of snow on the roof, the suspension is completely bottomed out. At that point, the floor and wheel wells are acting as bump stops, and taking the additional load.
...Not to mention the stress being put on the roof, walls, and attachment points.
For some of us, a roof that does not shed weight can be a problem.
I'm sure it could be a potential problem for someone living in Maine, too.
*(All three replacement axles under this trailer were ordered to Starcraft specs. [I still have all of the receipts and repair invoices.] They seem to be set up with the stops beyond the point at which the tires go through the floor. Dumb. But that wasn't the point. The point was that weight matters in some places, and a roof that doesn't shed weight can be a liability and massively overload your axle(s).)