Hi GPW and eaglesdare,
I recently read, that the result of a communication is not necessarily what
you have said, but what others think you have said [I'm paraphrasing it].
Just to clear things up:
You guys came on/back sort of strongly and somewhat defensively
sounding [to me at least], which perplexed me as all I was doing was
discussing or presenting my view of some things that were recently
being discussed and also referenced things from past postings which were
related to the discussion.
It seems that, somehow, you guys took it as questioning the Foamie
concept . That is not at all the case. Participants on the Foamie Thread
are all just interested in exploring and maybe improving the concept and
using it for their building needs - either when planning/designing, in
progress, or when they are able to start one. That is what my post was,
nothing more -nothing less.
I'm not saying one way is better than the rest, which seems to be the
way things were taken. The last sentence in this quote clearly says that:
]And again, another consideration is the COST. Thrifty is good,
but part of that to me, has to also consider any possibility of extra benefits
that the extra cost of these alternate [from TBII&III] exterior coatings
provide. They may be worth it. But overall, I think there's room for all
methods here - as long as they meet the individual builders needs/criteria.
I think the Foamie concept is great. That is why I participate in the
discussions.
And I laud you, GPW, for originating the idea, and the thread for it; and
also you, eaglesdare, for completing the first campable Foamie - the
"proof of concept", so to speak. I wasn't saying your "Baby" is 'ugly', I
was only exploring and discussing an aspect of it I wish to explore
further.
When I am able to start a build, it will be a TTT style on the bigger end of
the TTT scale, as that will fit my needs best. That is an area that hasn't
been fully explored yet, although there are a few similar builds now-in-
progress that are pioneering this Foamie style, so we Foamlings are
watching their progress. We are all learning, wishing them success, and
collectively trying to help work out the details or exploring alternative
ways of approaching the builds. That is all the post was about, as was so stated:
I guess what it boils down to for me is, that it appears [I have to
say that as I haven't finished a design yet or started in on a build yet.]
Foamies, as originally conceived, and/or with whatever additional
elements added, seem to be the most economical and simplest way to
build a TD/TTT. But, doing so still entails investments of time, materials
and mental processes. I just want to get the best result possible for my
efforts and money when the time comes. Too much maintenance or short
'product' life won't satisfy my aims when building one. Therefore the
further look into the HWFF exterior coatings, especially for the use on
the "larger" TTT type of Foamie.
Perhaps this
Too much maintenance or short 'product' life won't satisfy my aims when building one.
was misconstrued.
That refers to the total build, not just the exterior coating/finish. All I'm
seeking is the best mix of everything for me in the final product when I
get to the point of being able to build and complete my own Foamie
design. Meanwhile it's fun watching others embark on their own Foamie
Adventure.
Cheers,
Norm/mezmo
If you have a house - you have a hobby.