More questions about EPS vs XPS

Canvas covered foamies (Thrifty Alternatives...)

Moderator: eaglesdare

Re: More questions about EPS vs XPS

Postby GPW » Tue Oct 30, 2018 5:34 pm

Guy , hot as it is here we still have to search for the good stuff … Not as common as we’d like …
There’s no place like Foam !
User avatar
GPW
Gold Donating Member
 
Posts: 14911
Images: 546
Joined: Thu Feb 09, 2006 7:58 pm
Location: New Orleans

Re: More questions about EPS vs XPS

Postby Xanthoman » Thu Nov 01, 2018 2:44 am

And running the math on composites is a pain even when you have proper material strength charts; it’s not even possible to do more than ballpark with ad-hoc materials! The good old test a sample and go from there is by far the best way until you are trying to optimize or plan for mass production.
Xanthoman
Teardrop Advisor
 
Posts: 58
Images: 3
Joined: Sat Sep 24, 2016 2:02 pm
Location: Rexburg, Idaho

Re: More questions about EPS vs XPS

Postby MikeG2 » Thu Nov 01, 2018 3:17 am

Do you not get PIR (polyisocyanurate) insulation in the US? The leading brand name over here is Celotex. It is so much stronger, and so much better an insulant than either variety of polystyrene that nobody here uses anything else. It strikes me as an ideal material for the use you guys intend.
MikeG2
Teardrop Inspector
 
Posts: 21
Joined: Wed Oct 10, 2018 4:45 am
Location: Suffolk, England
Top

Re: More questions about EPS vs XPS

Postby GPW » Thu Nov 01, 2018 6:13 am

X, individual testing was the most convenient and friendly method …

Mike , some people have used it … But we found it was more questionable , health wise … https://foursevenfive.com/blog/why-foam ... gredients/ and it’s brittle ...
There’s no place like Foam !
User avatar
GPW
Gold Donating Member
 
Posts: 14911
Images: 546
Joined: Thu Feb 09, 2006 7:58 pm
Location: New Orleans
Top

Re: More questions about EPS vs XPS

Postby Xanthoman » Thu Nov 01, 2018 5:04 pm

My house is insulated with polyiso because I got it cheap from overruns and seconds. I think it’s too pricey for its small gain over other foams. Specifically the fact in immobile construction the use of cut and installed panels defeats the great advantage of foam and that’s the continual barrier by use of a gap filling air inhibitor. CCSPF (closed cell spray polyurethane foam) is better at one inch over three inches of other materials based solely on the air blocking, vapor control, and stiffening of the structure. R-value (or the U-value for ones across the pond) is poorer (by just a little) than polyiso but cutting and installing is the issue with regular insulation for the most part, where 50% (or more) is installed incorrectly and won’t match the predicted K value of the envelope anyhow.

Also, Polyiso is very brittle without skins. It sands down beautifully, and would be great for stack and shaping, It also doesn’t come back from minor indentations as easily, it likes to stay deformed. But if i found a supply of it for cheap I would use it again. A mobile camper included. But I wouldn’t pay more for it.
Xanthoman
Teardrop Advisor
 
Posts: 58
Images: 3
Joined: Sat Sep 24, 2016 2:02 pm
Location: Rexburg, Idaho
Top

Re: More questions about EPS vs XPS

Postby Ottsville » Thu Nov 01, 2018 5:40 pm

Doesn't polyiso also tend to absorb water after a long period? I feel like I have seen a saturated piece of it at some time in the past.
Ottsville
The 300 Club
 
Posts: 318
Images: 4
Joined: Tue May 08, 2018 2:19 am
Location: Virginia
Top

Re: More questions about EPS vs XPS

Postby Xanthoman » Thu Nov 01, 2018 10:00 pm

I can’t recall definitively but I believe it absorbed some. I left a few scraps around and after the snow melt I know their skins were ruined but think it only penetrated water 1/4” or so; not like a sponge. Admittedly, this is just a little bit, but more than a teardrop should see in its lifetime so should be fine. I never did a submersion and weight test...
Xanthoman
Teardrop Advisor
 
Posts: 58
Images: 3
Joined: Sat Sep 24, 2016 2:02 pm
Location: Rexburg, Idaho
Top

Re: More questions about EPS vs XPS

Postby rowerwet » Fri Nov 02, 2018 10:48 am

If you can only get 1" locally, you can easily laminate sheets together with gorilla glue, using an overlapping pattern of loops
User avatar
rowerwet
Gold Donating Member
 
Posts: 2075
Images: 521
Joined: Mon Apr 20, 2009 12:52 am
Location: Merrimack River Valley
Top

Re: More questions about EPS vs XPS

Postby KennethW » Fri Nov 02, 2018 5:21 pm

I built a camper out of 1" XPS. With a nice curve. It will span 5' on the roof. XPS is a lot stronger then EPS. If you want reinforce the roof. You could run a couple tubes(closet tubes) across the roof with a 1/2" space and a couple spacers between the pipe the the roof to supporting the roof and to hanger cloths on.
KennethW
1000 Club
1000 Club
 
Posts: 1188
Images: 82
Joined: Wed Feb 20, 2013 8:01 pm
Top

Re: More questions about EPS vs XPS

Postby QueticoBill » Fri Nov 02, 2018 7:04 pm

Xanthoman wrote:As far as the squared vs cubed strength; the equation for moment of inertia, I,which dictates bending max strength,Mc/I, is geometrically: bh^3, so yes it is cubic. But when you account for shear and other things it doesn’t translate exactly. .


Its been many years but I think you're considering deflection and I was addressing simple bending moment, which I'm pretty sure is proportional to the square of the depth.
QB
A tear with no name: viewtopic.php?f=50&t=67624
QueticoBill
Silver Donating Member
 
Posts: 1183
Images: 22
Joined: Sun Apr 14, 2013 7:22 am
Location: Clayton NY
Top

Re: More questions about EPS vs XPS

Postby Xanthoman » Fri Nov 02, 2018 10:05 pm

I am not sure what you mean by simple bending moment...simple bending moment is just force,F, by distance,d, of moment arm. M=Fd. The way an object behaves has nothing to do with the moment as it deals with its own geometry, thus converting the effects of the moment, torsion, shear forces into stress. The greater the moment of inertia, I, the greater resistance to deformation geometrically. Material properties then come into play such as Young’s Modulus, E, (modulus of elasticity) which will dictate the deflection based on loading, P. Often the goal in design is to find a maximum acceptable deflection and then work to find the minimum deflection based on material and geometries involved and adjust to be within desired parameters. All these work down from total yield strength and making sure the combined stresses don’t deform the object or deflect it beyond the bounds. And I forgot the 1/12 value in my last equation for I of a rectangular cross section, I will edit that. I’m not sure exactly what you are referring, but I don’t recall anything being a simple square as you suggest...And without diagrams none of this mumbo-jumbo will mean anything to anyone who hasn’t taken a statics or strengths course at some point...haha
Xanthoman
Teardrop Advisor
 
Posts: 58
Images: 3
Joined: Sat Sep 24, 2016 2:02 pm
Location: Rexburg, Idaho
Top

Re: More questions about EPS vs XPS

Postby GPW » Sat Nov 03, 2018 7:55 am

And to simplify things , When in doubt make the Foam THICKER …. We used EPS ( bead foam) that was 3.5” Thick ! And that over an aircraft style rib and stringer frame … Plenty strong … over 5 years now living Outside in the open ;)

The original intent of a Foamie … a basically Inexpensive, very Low maintenance travel trailer ...
There’s no place like Foam !
User avatar
GPW
Gold Donating Member
 
Posts: 14911
Images: 546
Joined: Thu Feb 09, 2006 7:58 pm
Location: New Orleans
Top

Previous

Return to Foamies

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests