Comparing weights of building methods.

General Discussion about almost anything Teardrop or camping related

Re: Comparing weights of building methods.

Postby saywhatthat » Sat Oct 31, 2020 3:14 pm

Well I will never make you a believer. LOL. this foam is used in houses that use stucco most shop roofs the foil backing, is to reflect heat .you have to remove the foil crappy glue. but its weaker than eps. maybe a bit more research it is used as structural backing on stucco building . This is what is great about these tiny trailers so many ways to build .If it can rot it will. We done a few trailers with out trailtop frame . works great .
The original flat pack about $2.25 US a square foot
Il suffit de le faire
fast, cheap, fiberglass/ foam stressed skin panels
viewtopic.php?f=50&t=73945

Build 4.5 by 8' using Trailtop fiberglass Components
http://tnttt.com/viewtopic.php?f=50&t=70729
User avatar
saywhatthat
500 Club
 
Posts: 512
Images: 135
Joined: Sat Jun 11, 2016 3:31 am

Re: Comparing weights of building methods.

Postby Squigie » Sat Oct 31, 2020 4:31 pm

saywhatthat wrote:Fiberglass is heavy? Yes a full fiberglass trailer maybe heavy . with the RIGHT FOAM . the foam is the structural . the glass keeps you from putting your finger through the foam. again a wast of time and cash paints you can paint it with then use polyester resin, but make sure you use it right and enough of it. if you time gose for $.10 a hour you save some cash and have a weak piece of crap how Hard can it be use the right structural foam about $20.00 a sheet

No one is attacking you.
Logic and reason are fine here.
There's no need to react with unnecessary emotion.
User avatar
Squigie
The 300 Club
 
Posts: 403
Joined: Sun Aug 04, 2019 7:52 am
Location: Southeastern ID

Re: Comparing weights of building methods.

Postby John61CT » Sat Oct 31, 2020 4:56 pm

I have a hard time extracting meaning from that, much less emotional affect
John61CT
1000 Club
1000 Club
 
Posts: 1958
Joined: Thu Nov 17, 2016 4:36 pm
Top

Re: Comparing weights of building methods.

Postby saywhatthat » Sat Oct 31, 2020 5:18 pm

Personne ne vous attaque. Did not think any was . many ways to build . To me for the first time builder glass over foam is the easiest way to build. With the cost of tools .With G/F can start with under $5.00 of tools if you mess up the easiest to fix . light est way to build So one person can flip the pod. Pod can take years to build with out any warping are rotting. Cost less than wood .
But so much bad BS on the web. Even with pictures have many say it can not be done. I'm a bit lazy and so cheap so if a easier way to do this I be doing it. the main post was Are 100 year pods are about 145 lbs with glass out side 1'' of THE RIGHT FOAM glass on the inside .With willy windows 4.5 wide 4.5 height b 8 foot long Using a fiberglass trailtop component frame kit. poly resin is about 9 lbs a gal. To even be lighter By not using the trailtop it is even lighter. After fire season is over in Feb hopefully will do just a foam under glass .Using a real kit profile with out a trailtop fiberglass component kit .Should be 20 pounds lighter than with trailtop components .To show how easy and light.
Last edited by saywhatthat on Sun Nov 01, 2020 8:16 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Il suffit de le faire
fast, cheap, fiberglass/ foam stressed skin panels
viewtopic.php?f=50&t=73945

Build 4.5 by 8' using Trailtop fiberglass Components
http://tnttt.com/viewtopic.php?f=50&t=70729
User avatar
saywhatthat
500 Club
 
Posts: 512
Images: 135
Joined: Sat Jun 11, 2016 3:31 am
Top

Re: Comparing weights of building methods.

Postby twisted lines » Sat Oct 31, 2020 11:19 pm

Smaller the lighter, priority’s ?
I’m a big guy and wish mine was 11’ but it is 5’ inside.
I like the sandwich (weighted) method, the bagging came out really nice, if I could send a file I would sure think about it but I still wouldn’t glass the corners to much unprotected previous pleasure (I hate the smell) .
1.5” foam Baltic Burch glued to it, with all the wooden supports U need, & go light Seal it / paint it
Glue and paint are another worm can, Wish I knew for # 2 but I’m still not done with #1 Still think I’ll buy that book :lol:
I
Racking up; And Rapin foam
User avatar
twisted lines
1000 Club
1000 Club
 
Posts: 1243
Images: 2
Joined: Wed Oct 10, 2018 4:37 am
Location: Jefferson
Top

Re: Comparing weights of building methods.

Postby GTS225 » Sun Nov 01, 2020 5:45 am

As a bit of a sidebar to this subject, I've wondered a few times how something like this might turn out in the weight department.
https://www.equipmentfacts.com/listings ... 1586475144

This one happens to be 1000 gallons, but I've seen a 1600 up close, and it seems to me that it would lend itself quite well to a somewhat roomy camper shell. One would surely not need the running gear or pump systems, as it would never be carrying the weight of the fluid again.
Pros; Ready-made top opening for a vent fan.
Weatherproof.
(Probably) paintable.
Almost critter-proof. Even bears would have a hard time getting in.
The design of the understructure lends itself well to an internal floor install.

Cons; One would have to learn plastics welding in order to install a door.
No insulating value to the material.
One would almost have to paint it to keep from being disturbed at night by vehicle lighting.
Rounded walls won't help for internal finishing.
Material probably can't be glued to. (I suspect HDPE)

Buying one new would be prohibitively expensive, but if a guy could pick up a leaker on the cheap.......
Still.....so much is already done for a builder.

Just my thoughts.....Roger
GTS225
The 300 Club
 
Posts: 316
Joined: Wed Aug 29, 2018 2:11 am
Location: Waterloo, Iowa
Top

Re: Comparing weights of building methods.

Postby John61CT » Sun Nov 01, 2020 6:09 am

Wow, could not be farther off topic IMO. . .

Sure, if the plastic bit was magically levitated behind your little TV, that would (maybe?) be light!

Or, do you mean sell off the trailer and start from scratch building a light chassis frame?

Because your proposed frame having been designed to carry 9-14,000 lbs

has to itself weigh a minimum of 1500-2500 lbs!

Not to mention, would you actually **want** to live in a plastic tube? For me, only for a couple nights, even if desperately homeless seeking overnight shelter from a storm.
John61CT
1000 Club
1000 Club
 
Posts: 1958
Joined: Thu Nov 17, 2016 4:36 pm
Top

Re: Comparing weights of building methods.

Postby twisted lines » Sun Nov 01, 2020 8:23 am

I have personally been in tanks like that only a different color; The lids suck, Very narrow between ribs at the bottom, wall’s are thick and move a lot with temperature, The bigger one my be different.
You could possibly bolt or rivet to the end for a door there pretty darn tough.
Racking up; And Rapin foam
User avatar
twisted lines
1000 Club
1000 Club
 
Posts: 1243
Images: 2
Joined: Wed Oct 10, 2018 4:37 am
Location: Jefferson
Top

Re: Comparing weights of building methods.

Postby Tom&Shelly » Sun Nov 01, 2020 11:30 am

GTS225 wrote:As a bit of a sidebar to this subject, I've wondered a few times how something like this might turn out in the weight department.
https://www.equipmentfacts.com/listings ... 1586475144



Boy! I wouldn't even consider getting in one of those if there's any chance at all it ever carried anything but water. Even with adequate ventilation, I can imagine what vapors from residual insecticides/herbicides/etc. might do :frightened:

Tom
174145 170466 173366
Tom&Shelly
Palladium Donating Member
 
Posts: 2464
Images: 2282
Joined: Tue Sep 05, 2017 3:27 pm
Location: New Mexico
Top

Re: Comparing weights of building methods.

Postby RJ Howell » Mon Nov 02, 2020 7:15 am

saltydawg wrote: Sure using a bedsheet and 15 lbs a gallon of house paint might be lighter but it would be very easily damaged as well as not strong enough for more than a 4x8 teardrop that never sees anything rougher than a pot hole.


Having no idea what John said vs, your quotes.. I do take offense to a PMF foamie not being able to withstand more than a pothole. My first was my sleeper cap for my 4x4 truck. Far lighter than the short cap I had on it (I alone could handle it) and survived very well wheeling through the woods in New England (scraping trees and bouncing over rock trails).

Image

Now the new build (fiberglass over) is just as stronger!

Image

Don't underestimate foamie! As strong as a 'stick built' with aluminum over, of course not. Kinda like a Cement structure being stronger than a wood structure. Each has there place..
RJ Howell
1000 Club
1000 Club
 
Posts: 1170
Images: 36
Joined: Sat Jul 27, 2019 6:08 am
Top

Re: Comparing weights of building methods.

Postby RJ Howell » Mon Nov 02, 2020 7:20 am

GTS225 wrote:As a bit of a sidebar to this subject, I've wondered a few times how something like this might turn out in the weight department.
https://www.equipmentfacts.com/listings ... 1586475144

Just my thoughts.....Roger


I see many possibilities with that! How cool!
RJ Howell
1000 Club
1000 Club
 
Posts: 1170
Images: 36
Joined: Sat Jul 27, 2019 6:08 am
Top

Re: Comparing weights of building methods.

Postby saltydawg » Mon Nov 02, 2020 8:08 am

RJ Howell wrote:
I do take offense to a PMF foamie not being able to withstand more than a pothole... Each has their place.


I understand but it you look back I said anything over a teardrop and using a bedsheet, not canvas,. And your current build is bigger that a teardrop, but its also not on a trailer. Would you try to make a 12 foot long body with 5.5 inside width and almost 5.5 inside height out of foam and pmf? It certainly has its uses, esp PMF, which would be my third preferred skin after premade skins and fiberglass. Heck I like the foamy idea as it cant rot. Mine is a "foamy" with a premade fiberglass skin.

What I meant is I dont think it could handle larger size trailers ie over 10 to 12 feet long 6 feet high and wide, twisting and turning down really rutted roads. It does have an advantage on those roads for smaller trailers, very little weight and moment of inertia.
Scott
Lost in Maryland
2021 just said to 2020, hold my beer and watch this.
saltydawg
500 Club
 
Posts: 647
Joined: Tue Apr 24, 2012 8:34 pm
Location: Maryland
Top

Re: Comparing weights of building methods.

Postby Squigie » Mon Nov 02, 2020 12:08 pm

I think RJ finally worded things in a way that may change how I look at foamie construction.
I'm going to have to think about it a bit.
I may actually view foam as weaker, now, than I did previously.

GTS225 wrote:As a bit of a sidebar to this subject, I've wondered a few times how something like this might turn out in the weight department.
https://www.equipmentfacts.com/listings ... 1586475144

This one happens to be 1000 gallons, but I've seen a 1600 up close, and it seems to me that it would lend itself quite well to a somewhat roomy camper shell. One would surely not need the running gear or pump systems, as it would never be carrying the weight of the fluid again.
Pros; Ready-made top opening for a vent fan.
Weatherproof.
(Probably) paintable.
Almost critter-proof. Even bears would have a hard time getting in.
The design of the understructure lends itself well to an internal floor install.

Cons; One would have to learn plastics welding in order to install a door.
No insulating value to the material.
One would almost have to paint it to keep from being disturbed at night by vehicle lighting.
Rounded walls won't help for internal finishing.
Material probably can't be glued to. (I suspect HDPE)

Buying one new would be prohibitively expensive, but if a guy could pick up a leaker on the cheap.......
Still.....so much is already done for a builder.

Just my thoughts.....Roger

Many are polyethylene.
The useful type and range of tanks, in my opinion, would be about 750-1,000 gallon box tanks or "low profile" tanks. They're not as thick or heavy as the bigger tanks. Roughly the size of a TD and usually about 300-600 lbs.

But, like most people, I have no interest in sleeping in a tank, or modifying one.

Water tank cages might be of interest to some people, as pre-fab frame 'legos'. But it's questionable for weight. If you stick three cages together for a ~4.5x4x9' or ~4x4.5x9' box to be insulated and skinned, you'd be looking at around 320 lbs for just the frame, not including a floor; or about 430-450 lbs if the cut out sides are repurposed as the floor.
They are cheap, though. When sold off by commercial operations, they're usually available for $15-30 each, or even straight scrap price.
User avatar
Squigie
The 300 Club
 
Posts: 403
Joined: Sun Aug 04, 2019 7:52 am
Location: Southeastern ID
Top

Re: Comparing weights of building methods.

Postby saltydawg » Mon Nov 02, 2020 2:22 pm

Squigie wrote:I think RJ finally worded things in a way that may change how I look at foamie construction.
I'm going to have to think about it a bit.
I may actually view foam as weaker, now, than I did previously.



Foam in its self is weak, even the 25 psi dow foam in my trailer. What gives it strength is the sandwich of the skins with the foam. When trying to bend the "sandwich" the outer skin is in tension, the inner is in compression, the foam is in compression all the way thru. PMF and fiberglass are both pretty dang strong in in tension, edge to fiberglass on that one. On the compression side, hand laid glass if just one layer of say 6 oz is probably about the same as 10 oz canvas PMF, the slight edge going to the epoxy being stronger than the paint on the canvas ( IMO ). now using a bed sheet under compression I bet its significantly weaker.

Now as soon as we step it up to something like the .055 thick fiberglass skin with gelcoat that I used for my skins, I would bet they are many times stronger under compression that 10oz canvas. Same if you did 2 layers of canvas it would be much stronger than 1 layer.

The real issue come in is the foam. The normal home depot stuff is 10 psi, that means the foam can support 10 psi and not dent or compress, I used 25 psi, thats 2 and a half times stronger. And I think the isocyanurate foam is even less than the 10 psi and more brittle.
Scott
Lost in Maryland
2021 just said to 2020, hold my beer and watch this.
saltydawg
500 Club
 
Posts: 647
Joined: Tue Apr 24, 2012 8:34 pm
Location: Maryland
Top

Re: Comparing weights of building methods.

Postby dogcatcher » Mon Nov 02, 2020 3:26 pm

Today I can get a brand new 1500 gallon poly water tank for $750, weighs 210 pounds. It is close to 8 foot in diameter and 64 inches high. Cut a door, 2 window openings and enclose them for $250. I know, I have a 5 year old deer blind that is made like that. 2 of us loaded on a trailer along with camping gear and the first night at deer camp it rained, so we opted to sleep in the water tank/deer blind. Dry, warm and comfortable. It has also been through several West Texas hail storms, without a dent, not to mention 5 years of sun, cold, and all kinds of weather.

Granted, it is not a tear drop, and it does NOT LOOK LIKE travel trailer, but it would work, looks "cool" and you could be the talk of the camp grounds. 200 cubic foot, about the same as an 6x8x4 trailer.

https://www.plastic-mart.com/product/11 ... 9UQAvD_BwE
dogcatcher
Teardrop Advisor
 
Posts: 76
Joined: Tue Dec 03, 2019 3:48 pm
Location: Abilene Texas
Top

PreviousNext

Return to General Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests