
MickinOz wrote:I changed the oil and filter in the ute.
If I could change one thing on the best little truck I've ever owned, it would the oil filter location.
It's in behind the turbo, and I struggle to reach it from the top and the bottom.
If I put it on a hoist or over my inspection pit I struggle to reach the thing,
If I go at it from the top I have to stand on something and it's a struggle to get it out after I've screwed it off.
And putting it back on! I used to pre-prime my filters. Not this one. I'd just end up pouring the priming oil on the ground.
Good thing this little truck pumps up pressure almost instantly.
Might look at remote locating the filter.
MickinOz wrote:Ah.........where do I start?
The conventional wisdom over here is that Ford Australia invented the ute around 1932-34 in response to a 1932 letter from a farmer's wife who wanted "a vehicle to go to church in on a Sunday and which can carry our pigs to market on Mondays".
As you say, a coupe utility. I.e. a hybrid cargo tub and passenger compartment body based off a passenger car.
There is one of the first ones on display at the Birdwood motor museum in South Australia.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coup%C3%A ... tility.jpg
A gorgeous (hot-rodded, but still) classic if ever I saw one.
Things took off from there and there have been utes for every generation of Ford and Holden cars all the way to the late 2010's when production ceased.
Though by the 2000's the ute tub was separate from the body, as seen in this 2010 Ford Ba ute.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ford_Falcon_(BA)#/media/File:2004_Ford_Falcon_(BA)_XR6_Turbo_utility_(2010-07-08)_02.jpg
Still essentially a passenger car with a cargo tub, but not one piece anymore.
The Japanese came along and offered competition, though their offerings were not usually directly derived from their passenger cars.
These were still called utes. I own a 1989/90 Mitsubishi Triton ute. It was sold in the states as Mitsubishi Mighty Max and a Dodge Ram 50.
Then the trend to ever bigger and bigger 2 and 4 door 4x4 utes took off.
These are still "utes".
But, we sometimes call 'em trucks or even Tonka Trucks. You might say, over a few sherbets at a barbie, "Yeah mate, I'm pretty happy with me little Tonka Truck," and the average Aussie bloke will know what you are probably driving - a Toyota Hilux, Nissan Navara, Mazda Bravo, Isuzu D-Max, Ford Ranger or Holden Colorado. (Not to be confused with a Chev Colorado.) VW and Mercedes are staring to make in-roads into the market now.
By the way, no one of a certain vintage says "Chevvy" over here - its Chev or Chevrolet.
I believe a South African, of whom we have a few, would call all these vehicles "bakkies". They of course are in love with VW Amoroks, which just goes to show them Saffers never did have any sense.
Rams, Silverados and F-Trucks have been here for a long time. Ford used to assemble F-trucks here in right hand drive, at which time F-trucks with tubs were "utes" and F-trucks with flat bed trays were "trucks".
Of course, all the "Yank Tanks" are imported by smaller firms and converted here these days. This leaves these vehicles only available to people with more money than commonsense. About the cheapest 2021 Silverado you can buy is $120,00. The cheapest 2021 F-150 advertised on carsales.com.au is $149,000
So, we don't have a lot of American "trucks" running around. They exist, of course, but bloody expensive. If that American truck has a tub on the back, rather than a flat bed tray, it's a ute.
But, we do some times refer to our body-and-tub-on-chassis 4wd utes as "trucks"
Of course, if an Aussie at the aforementioned barbie was to say "I drive trucks", this is what would spring to mind:
https://westernstar.com.au/western-star-6900-fxc/
Hope all this clears it up for ya.
MickinOz wrote:I hope them there 100 pounders have been open to atmosphere for a long time.
My father in law went to the great workshop in the sky when one of those exploded.
Wasn't quite the same situation - some sort of flashback on a gas welding set, but I was stunned how much grunt there is in a 100 pounder.
DrewsBrews wrote:MickinOz wrote:I hope them there 100 pounders have been open to atmosphere for a long time.
My father in law went to the great workshop in the sky when one of those exploded.
Wasn't quite the same situation - some sort of flashback on a gas welding set, but I was stunned how much grunt there is in a 100 pounder.
I took the valves off yesterday and set them on their sides, then at an angle. After a few hours.. Ive got a spot where I can flip one upside down with the opening still clear. Once done, Ill screw the valves back on hand tight to keep rain out until Im ready to proceed. Then fill them with hose water just before I do my first cuts.
I wonder how the situation occurred with your father in law.. I didnt think propane had capability to self oxidize (typical hydrocarbon with no oxygen in the molecule). Perhaps the tank was previously filled with oxidizer, then filled with propane? Or maybe a different gas he was using. In the US I think they have completely different threads/fittings on different gas types to prevent accidentally mixing fuel/oxidizer, but I really don't know for sure.
Ive actually seen the aftermath of a propane tank caught in a structure fire. The pressure relief valve opened and would have been quite a show for a while until it was empty. But no explosion. As long as no oxidizer made it into the tank, It is rather difficult to get them to explode without blocking off all venting methods. When the tank is pretty much empty (no pressure) and the valve removed, I doubt combustion pressure could build up enough to rupture. I suppose the situation could change if the integrity of the tank is compromised by cutting into it. So I take the above precautions to keep from testing my theories.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests