MtnDon wrote:A Fantastic brand fan draws something like 1.5 to 3 amps depending on speed. Multiply the appropriate amperage by the hours of use = amp-hours used at the rated battery voltage. Let's say 8 hours use on medium speed, about 2.2 amps as a guess. 8 x 2.2 = 17.6 amp-hours. Call that 18 amp-hours. Multiply 18 x 12 (the battery nominal voltage) = 216 watts used.
Panel puts out 45 watts maximum. 216 / 45 = 4.8 hours time required for the 216 watts. BUT that assumes everything is ideal, not real. Add at least 20% to that to allow for battery inefficiencies in charge and discharge. 4.8 +20% = 5.76 hours of full sun. But there are few locations that have ideal sun on the PV panels for that length of time in a single day.
You can use that method to adjust for loads, sun-hours, etc and get a rough idea of how things will go.
I have used panels like that to keep batteries charged over the winter period of non use with great success (with a small cheap charge controller to ensure the batteries did not overcharge). One panel per pair of 6 volt golf cart batteries.
absolutsnwbrdr wrote:If you search ebay, you can usually find a pretty good deal on kits. I think 100W kits start around $150 or $160.
I get my stuff from http://www.SolarBlvd.com, and they have an ebay store as well.
MtnDon wrote:A Fantastic brand fan draws something like 1.5 to 3 amps depending on speed. Multiply the appropriate amperage by the hours of use = amp-hours used at the rated battery voltage. Let's say 8 hours use on medium speed, about 2.2 amps as a guess. 8 x 2.2 = 17.6 amp-hours. Call that 18 amp-hours. Multiply 18 amp-hrs x 12 Volts (the battery nominal voltage) = 216 watt-hrs used. (watts=amps*volts)
Panel puts out 45 watts maximum. 216 watt-hrs / 45 watts = 4.8 hours time required for the 216 watt-hrs. BUT that assumes everything is ideal, not real. Add at least 20% to that to allow for battery inefficiencies in charge and discharge. 4.8 hours +20% = 5.76 hours of full sun. But there are few locations that have ideal sun on the PV panels for that length of time in a single day.
My high school physics teacher used to have a fit when I left the units off my calculations. I guess she made an impression on me after all.
bdosborn wrote:MtnDon wrote:A Fantastic brand fan draws something like 1.5 to 3 amps depending on speed. Multiply the appropriate amperage by the hours of use = amp-hours used at the rated battery voltage. Let's say 8 hours use on medium speed, about 2.2 amps as a guess. 8 x 2.2 = 17.6 amp-hours. Call that 18 amp-hours. Multiply 18 amp-hrs x 12 Volts (the battery nominal voltage) = 216 watt-hrs used. (watts=amps*volts)
Panel puts out 45 watts maximum. 216 watt-hrs / 45 watts = 4.8 hours time required for the 216 watt-hrs. BUT that assumes everything is ideal, not real. Add at least 20% to that to allow for battery inefficiencies in charge and discharge. 4.8 hours +20% = 5.76 hours of full sun. But there are few locations that have ideal sun on the PV panels for that length of time in a single day.
My high school physics teacher used to have a fit when I left the units off my calculations. I guess she made an impression on me after all.![]()
The 20% losses is conservative IMHO, and assumes the panel is angled at the sun. Add another 10-20% if it's laying flat.
The NT Kit has a junky controller that's notorious for failing and fluorescent lights you probably won't want to use in your tear.
Here's an 80 watt panel:
Solar Blvd
And a good controller:
Morningstar
For about the same price. More power and a better controller.
Bruce
MtnDon wrote:There is another thing to consider when comparing the NT and HF panels to the SolarBlvd panel Bruce linked to (as well as others). The physical dimensions.
The set of 3 NT panels that produce 45 watts are approximately 36 x 36 inches in size. The one 80 watt panel that Bruce picked is only 34" x 26.5" (got the measurements precisely noted that time :). Almost twice the power in less space. Much better deal when working with small trailers.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests