1/8 2.5x2.5 or 3/16 2x2 for tongue

Anything to do with mechanical, construction etc

1/8 2.5x2.5 or 3/16 2x2 for tongue

Postby Southern Oregon Bob » Fri Mar 11, 2005 9:10 pm

I'm building a 4x10 TD that will spend some time off road with a tongue that won't be braced for the last 36-40 inches. Will either of these sizes work and is one stronger than the other? Thanks Bob
User avatar
Southern Oregon Bob
Teardrop Advisor
 
Posts: 59
Images: 2
Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 11:08 pm
Location: Southern Oregon

Postby Arne » Fri Mar 11, 2005 9:50 pm

www.freewebs.com/aero-1
---
.
I hope I never get too old to play (Arne, Sept 11, 2010)
.
User avatar
Arne
Mr. Subject Line
 
Posts: 5383
Images: 96
Joined: Fri Aug 13, 2004 12:25 pm
Location: Middletown, CT

Postby David Grason » Sat Mar 12, 2005 12:12 am

So Arne, if I'm understanding it correctly, the Cobra page is saying that square or round makes no difference if all other things are equal?
I am NOT a complete idiot! Some of the pieces are missing.
User avatar
David Grason
Teardrop Master
 
Posts: 290
Joined: Tue Nov 16, 2004 8:50 am
Location: Nashville, Tn.
Top

Postby Southern Oregon Bob » Sat Mar 12, 2005 1:34 am

So if I did the math right and what I was looking for was the polar moment of inertia that tells me the 1/8inch 2.5x2.5 is stronger then the 3/16inch 2x2 and the 1/8 2.5x2.5 is twice as strong as the 1/8 2x2. If thats right thanks for the link, if it is not I guess it's over my head and I'll need a simpler explanation. Still learning Bob
User avatar
Southern Oregon Bob
Teardrop Advisor
 
Posts: 59
Images: 2
Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 11:08 pm
Location: Southern Oregon
Top

Postby Arne » Sat Mar 12, 2005 8:14 am

I suspect you did the math right. Putting more space between top and bottom (or side to side for that matter) is more important than another 1/16" in material thickness.....

The new beams used in houses are nothing but 2x4's separated with plywood vertical sections, but can span longer distances than solid wood beams with the same external dimensions..

So, it is the top and bottom and separation that is most important.
www.freewebs.com/aero-1
---
.
I hope I never get too old to play (Arne, Sept 11, 2010)
.
User avatar
Arne
Mr. Subject Line
 
Posts: 5383
Images: 96
Joined: Fri Aug 13, 2004 12:25 pm
Location: Middletown, CT
Top

Postby angib » Sat Mar 12, 2005 11:34 am

I wrote a spreadsheet section properties calculator for the tongue strength discussion, so here's the results from it for the section modulus of some square tubes.

2" x 2" x 1/8" = 0.511 in3
2" x 2" x 3/16" = 0.701 in3 (+37%)
2.5" x 2.5" x 1/8" = 0.845 in3 (+65%)

I've included the effect of a realistic corner radius (1/4") in all cases. Strength is proportional to section modulus for a given material, if you ignore buckling.

Hope this helps.

Andrew
User avatar
angib
5000 Club
5000 Club
 
Posts: 5783
Images: 231
Joined: Fri Apr 30, 2004 2:04 pm
Location: (Olde) England
Top

Postby purplepickup » Sat Mar 12, 2005 2:08 pm

.....just to throw another option into the fray. :?

This is a picture of my tongue. It's made from 2 pcs of 1x2x1/8 wall welded together. I never figured the weight to strength ratio but I think the extra 1/4" web in the middle gives it a lot of verticle strength.

Image
George
:)
User avatar
purplepickup
Silver Donating Member
 
Posts: 413
Images: 3
Joined: Thu Jan 27, 2005 11:20 pm
Location: SW Michigan
Top

Postby Southern Oregon Bob » Sun Mar 13, 2005 12:54 am

Thanks everyone, I came to the forum to help get ideas for my TD and I'm getting that as well as second education. Now if someone could just teach me how to spell Bob :thumbsup:
User avatar
Southern Oregon Bob
Teardrop Advisor
 
Posts: 59
Images: 2
Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 11:08 pm
Location: Southern Oregon
Top

Postby angib » Sun Mar 13, 2005 8:41 am

OK,

2" x 1" x 1/8" = 0.292 in3
2" x 2" x 1/8" = 0.511 in3
so 2 No. @ 2" x 1" x 1/8" = 0.584 in3 (+ 14%)

Sideways, the double-1x2 has a Z of 0.513 in3 - which shows that extra material on the neutral axis doesn't make it stronger, which is what you would expect.

Now if someone could just teach me how to spell Bob

No need, Bob - you can already spell Bob perfectly. :lol:

Andrew
User avatar
angib
5000 Club
5000 Club
 
Posts: 5783
Images: 231
Joined: Fri Apr 30, 2004 2:04 pm
Location: (Olde) England
Top

Postby Southern Oregon Bob » Sun Mar 13, 2005 12:59 pm

Thats interesting. How about if you welded four cubes together. Is there anyway you could get a strength to weight improvement. I've already welded my 2.5x2.5 on but I was just curious. :thinking: Bob
User avatar
Southern Oregon Bob
Teardrop Advisor
 
Posts: 59
Images: 2
Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 11:08 pm
Location: Southern Oregon
Top

Postby angib » Mon Mar 14, 2005 8:02 am

Bob, I didn't include weight in the previous info, so here it is:
    2" x 2" x 1/8": Z = 0.511 in3 (+ 0%), weight = 3.05 lb/ft (+ 0%)
    Twin 2" x 1" x 1/8": Z = 0.584 in3 (+ 14%), weight = 4.40* lb/ft (+ 44%)
    2.5" x 2.5" x 1/8": Z = 0.845 in3 (+65%), weight = 3.90 lb/ft (+ 28%)
    * excludes the weight of the weld to join the twin tubes.
So you can see how much better the strength-to-weight of your 2-1/2" tube is, compared to the twin 1x2 tubes. Though whether that's important depends on whether you're trying to build light.

I'm working on putting my tube-strength spreadsheet on my web site, so everyone can play to their heart's content.

Andrew
User avatar
angib
5000 Club
5000 Club
 
Posts: 5783
Images: 231
Joined: Fri Apr 30, 2004 2:04 pm
Location: (Olde) England
Top

Postby Nitetimes » Mon Mar 14, 2005 10:10 am

Southern Oregon Bob - With that much tongue unbraced you normal shouldn't have any major concerns with the materials you mention. But, if you are going to be offroad, consider the extra bouncing and jerking around, I personally would go with either 2.5" or 3" X3/16" wall tubing as long as a little extra weight isn't a problem.
Rich


Image
ImageImage
-
The strongest reason for the people to retain the right to
keep and bear arms is, as a last resort, to protect themselves
against tyranny in government.
- Thomas Jefferson -
Personally, I carry a gun because I'm too young to die and too old to take a butt kickin'.
User avatar
Nitetimes
7000 Club
7000 Club
 
Posts: 7909
Images: 194
Joined: Sat Feb 12, 2005 12:44 am
Location: Butler,PA
Top

Postby purplepickup » Mon Mar 14, 2005 11:07 am

This is an enlightening thread. I assumed (incorrectly) that the two 1x2 pcs was much stronger and a weight advantage over a larger, thicker wall square tubing. My plan of a 10'L x 5'W x 5.5'H trailer may prove to be heavier than some and I travel long distances over uneven roads so I want as much strength as I can get. It's not to late to change.

I thank you for your calculations Andrew. Access to your spreadsheet would be helpful to some of us "engineering challenged" builders for sure.
George
:)
User avatar
purplepickup
Silver Donating Member
 
Posts: 413
Images: 3
Joined: Thu Jan 27, 2005 11:20 pm
Location: SW Michigan
Top

Postby SteveH » Mon Mar 14, 2005 5:13 pm

I guess I'm just to dense to understand this arithmatic thing..... :? My tongue is made of two pieces of 2" X 1/4" angle with a 2" X 1/4" strap welded to the bottom of them to form channels. So, is it strong enough?
SteveH
Calling an illegal alien an "undocumented immigrant"is like calling a drug dealer an "unlicensed pharmacist ".
User avatar
SteveH
2000 Club
2000 Club
 
Posts: 2101
Images: 42
Joined: Mon Nov 01, 2004 8:28 am
Location: Bexar Co, TX
Top

Postby Arne » Mon Mar 14, 2005 5:58 pm

Mine is 2 x 2 x 1/4" thick... 2 pieces butt welded together.. it's what I had....

I'm not concerned about it, but will not overload it.. The tear itself is pretty much balanced in the middle with only 75 pounds on the tongue end..

But, I won't be putting a heavy box on it...
www.freewebs.com/aero-1
---
.
I hope I never get too old to play (Arne, Sept 11, 2010)
.
User avatar
Arne
Mr. Subject Line
 
Posts: 5383
Images: 96
Joined: Fri Aug 13, 2004 12:25 pm
Location: Middletown, CT
Top

Next

Return to Teardrop Construction Tips & Techniques

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests