I have previously kept silent on this subject not wanting to start fanning the flames, but when I see so many new members believing that a certain expensive product is a must for their build, I feel I should add my opinion. I know this will surely start the flames, but remember it's is just my opinion, and is worth exactly what you paid for it, your mileage may vary, etc.
When I came to this forum from boat building for 25 years, I was surprised by the CPES following on this forum. Over the years on many boat building forums, the subject of CPES has come up from time to time. It usually starts a lively discussion that ends in the consensus that it is just "Snake Oil" and regular epoxy is superior, and much less expensive. Just go to any boat building forum and search CPES or open a new discussion, and see what comes up.
I have used Wests, System Three, Raka, MAS, and others. These are just regular epoxies, and have all worked great, and for me have held up to years of use, as they have on thousands and thousands of boats for at least a half century.
Why would anyone building a teardrop trailer using new wood want to use a product that is by design intended for wood rot repair, especially when it's much more expensive than the right product to be using.
If CPES was actually as wonderful as the sales-pitch says it is why are there no major competitors? Through recorded business history, anything that has such a strong market share and price structure as CPES, also has competitors and imitators! Also why is this copyrighted and patented (?) miracle cure sold under so many names: Smith&Co CPES, MultiWoodPrime, Lingu, RotDoctor CPES, LiquidWood? Why not just CPES, worldwide?
Larry C