KCStudly wrote:1/2 inch would be overkill. It would be better to spread out more fasteners than to just go with a few large ones.
KCStudly wrote:1/2 inch would be overkill. It would be better to spread out more fasteners than to just go with a few large ones.
I will be using sixteen (16) 3/8 inch bolts; 4 each along each of the front, rear, and two intermediate xmbrs. They will pass up through tabs ("clips") at the front and rear, and directly through the intermediate angle iron xmbrs; through blocking or 2x2 framing in the torsion box floor; into T-nuts recessed into the top surface of the floor frame, but hidden under the top floor skin. My trailer should not weigh more than 1500# loaded for bear. (We'll see.)
Here's a chart showing the cross sectional area (tensile stress area) for coarse and fine thread bolts. The cross sectional area of a bolt at its threads is significantly smaller than the nominal size would suggest. A 1/4-20 bolt has a tensile area of 0.0318 in^2. Multiply this times your 6 bolts and you get 0.1908 in^2 total. Assume the bolt is low grade mild steel with a tensile strength of 36kips (a kip is 1000 #/in^2), multiple this by 2/3 for a factor of safety on yielding and the steel is good for 24kips. Times how much steel you have (24kips x 0.1908 in^2) and you get 4579 lbs. capacity. That's a static load capability applied gradually and assumed to be applied evenly over your whole trailer.
In reality, your trailer frame will be trying to flex putting greater strain on either the front and rear bolts together or the middle ones alone. Also there is shock loading to be considered, such as when hitting a pothole or bumping a curb. The braking forces of your car will cause the bolts to see a shear load as the cabin attempts to slide forward off of the trailer frame.
So for me and my 16 bolts, 3/8UNC and 1500# camper it goes like this...
0.0775 in^2 per bolt x 16 bolts x 24,000 #/in^2 all divided by 1500# = 19.8
10 is a good conservative dynamic load factor (your trailer would have to hit something pretty hard to develop 10g's), so I am almost double that. In my "book" (not really a book, just my TLAR) that is an equivalent safety factor of 2.
Purist engineers can most certainly show me where I have strayed from the science of static and kinematic design theory, and how my safety factor is not being calculated accurately due to conservatism, but I'm okay with that.I know just enough about this stuff to be considered dangerous.
![]()
![]()
Forrest747 wrote:Ok this has been bugging me all afternoon. so after talking to some freinds and looking at some high school and college U-tube mannometer readings and finding those matched from teh Mythbusters readings. based upon those reading and using a frontal surface area of 20 sqft square and assuming we were pushing the trailer and not towing then the force upon teh face of the trailer is 2880 square inches (20*144) times the pressure of .25 psi you get a pressure of 720 pound acting full on the trailer.
Now using a table i found on gap between tractor trailers that the pressure drop is 12 percent for a 1.25 meter gap. using this pressure drop we get 633 pounds acting on the full frontal profile of a square trailer being towed at 65 mph. the closer the trailer is to the tow vehicle the less force acting on the trailer.
KCStudly wrote:1/2 inch would be overkill. It would be better to spread out more fasteners than to just go with a few large ones.
I will be using sixteen (16) 3/8 inch bolts; 4 each along each of the front, rear, and two intermediate xmbrs. They will pass up through tabs ("clips") at the front and rear, and directly through the intermediate angle iron xmbrs; through blocking or 2x2 framing in the torsion box floor; into T-nuts recessed into the top surface of the floor frame, but hidden under the top floor skin. My trailer should not weigh more than 1500# loaded for bear. (We'll see.)
Here's a chart showing the cross sectional area (tensile stress area) for coarse and fine thread bolts. The cross sectional area of a bolt at its threads is significantly smaller than the nominal size would suggest. A 1/4-20 bolt has a tensile area of 0.0318 in^2. Multiply this times your 6 bolts and you get 0.1908 in^2 total. Assume the bolt is low grade mild steel with a tensile strength of 36kips (a kip is 1000 #/in^2), multiple this by 2/3 for a factor of safety on yielding and the steel is good for 24kips. Times how much steel you have (24kips x 0.1908 in^2) and you get 4579 lbs. capacity. That's a static load capability applied gradually and assumed to be applied evenly over your whole trailer.
In reality, your trailer frame will be trying to flex putting greater strain on either the front and rear bolts together or the middle ones alone. Also there is shock loading to be considered, such as when hitting a pothole or bumping a curb. The braking forces of your car will cause the bolts to see a shear load as the cabin attempts to slide forward off of the trailer frame.
So for me and my 16 bolts, 3/8UNC and 1500# camper it goes like this...
0.0775 in^2 per bolt x 16 bolts x 24,000 #/in^2 all divided by 1500# = 19.8
10 is a good conservative dynamic load factor (your trailer would have to hit something pretty hard to develop 10g's), so I am almost double that. In my "book" (not really a book, just my TLAR) that is an equivalent safety factor of 2.
Purist engineers can most certainly show me where I have strayed from the science of static and kinematic design theory, and how my safety factor is not being calculated accurately due to conservatism, but I'm okay with that.I know just enough about this stuff to be considered dangerous.
![]()
![]()
danlott wrote: What I calculated out was to use whatever you want. I am going with the chewing gum and straps.![]()
Dan
Return to Teardrop Construction Tips & Techniques
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest