American Suicide - Interesting Reading

Things that don't fit anywhere else...

Postby Nitetimes » Mon Jul 16, 2007 12:28 am

Laredo wrote:Since this topic struck me as blatantly political, I'm going to make some political comments here.


I can always count on a good laugh when you reply to one of these topics! Thanks again. 8)
Rich


Image
ImageImage
-
The strongest reason for the people to retain the right to
keep and bear arms is, as a last resort, to protect themselves
against tyranny in government.
- Thomas Jefferson -
Personally, I carry a gun because I'm too young to die and too old to take a butt kickin'.
User avatar
Nitetimes
7000 Club
7000 Club
 
Posts: 7909
Images: 194
Joined: Sat Feb 12, 2005 12:44 am
Location: Butler,PA

Postby Arne » Mon Jul 16, 2007 7:28 am

See, now this is where these topics go wrong, by trying to take the exception and make a rule out of it. If you really want to make the roads safer, take teens off the road. Now, you're going to have to follow this closely.

First you said: "And drivers over 55 are dangerous. I have rights. Older drivers are as dangerous as people on drugs at Home Depot. Older drivers kill people regularly on the hiways. I have never heard of a an individual being hurt at Home Depot ."

So, let's take it one at a time, so you can follow it: (now, remember, you could have looked this up yourself and saved me the effort):

" there's no evidence that the elderly make bad drivers. Indeed, nearly all auto-insurance companies reduce rates for drivers over 55. Older people, after all, don't typically drag race, drive aggressively, or get into many accidents. Motorists between 55 and 70 are actually the safest drivers on the road. Only after age 85 do people get into as many accidents as teenagers."

Now, for home depot (again, if you had bothered, you could have found this on your own):

"Accidents claim lives of Home Depot shoppers"......... and here is the link:

http://www.bizjournals.com/atlanta/stories/2003/02/24/story2.html

I especially like this quote: ""Shopping isn't an inherently dangerous activity," Rasak said. "How can these things happen unless the stores are inherently dangerous?"

Don't you think YOU should do some checking before you start broadcasting falsehoods?
www.freewebs.com/aero-1
---
.
I hope I never get too old to play (Arne, Sept 11, 2010)
.
User avatar
Arne
Mr. Subject Line
 
Posts: 5383
Images: 96
Joined: Fri Aug 13, 2004 12:25 pm
Location: Middletown, CT

Postby Kevin A » Mon Jul 16, 2007 9:02 am

Ok guys, there has been two suggestions now to keep this thread civil, here's another reminder to NOT let it escalate to the point it needs to be removed. :shake hands:
"Follow me, I'm right behind you"

ImageImage
User avatar
Kevin A
The other guy
 
Posts: 3222
Images: 289
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 1:16 am
Location: California, Eureka
Top

Postby madjack » Mon Jul 16, 2007 9:10 am

...Let me echo Kevin and Doug...this is a dangerous topic and can go south in an instant...

Arne, I think(dangerous) that what Wolfix is saying, is that any time a law is passed that removes responsibility from the individual and gives it to the goverment is a bad thing...regardless of the reason or whether "reasonable" might think it, OK...the quote that comes to mind is ol' Ben Franklin's..."those who trade freedom for security, will soon find they have neither".....
madjack 8)
...I have come to believe that, conflict resolution, through violence, is never acceptable.....................mj
User avatar
madjack
Site Admin
 
Posts: 15128
Images: 177
Joined: Thu Dec 02, 2004 5:27 pm
Location: Central Louisiana
Top

Postby Arne » Mon Jul 16, 2007 11:05 am

MJ, I'm done here anyway.. I get tired of trying to have a reasonable discussion with unreasonable people.

Trying to make a point by distorting facts does no one any good...

Best I leave while still intact....
www.freewebs.com/aero-1
---
.
I hope I never get too old to play (Arne, Sept 11, 2010)
.
User avatar
Arne
Mr. Subject Line
 
Posts: 5383
Images: 96
Joined: Fri Aug 13, 2004 12:25 pm
Location: Middletown, CT
Top

Postby Ira » Mon Jul 16, 2007 3:00 pm

Ahhh...you're all just paranoid.

Unbelievable that the one thing that made this country great--immigration--has so many people up in arms and in fear.

Oh--I forget. They speak SPANISH.

Get over it. You'll survive, and America will survive.

Unless you kick them out--and there won't be a worker base to support the trillions of dollars coming due in entltlements for retiring Americans.

Then this country will REALLY be screwed.

Don't any of you guys look at this simple math? Or is your hatred of anything culturally different from you make you want to REALLY destroy this nation.

If they were English-speaking Canadians overrunning California, you couldn't care less. And if you say differently, you're just lying.

Unbelievable that I agree with Bush on this one.
Here we go again!
User avatar
Ira
Forum Storyteller
 
Posts: 5652
Images: 118
Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2005 2:16 pm
Location: South Florida
Top

Postby asianflava » Mon Jul 16, 2007 4:18 pm

Why don't you admins just lock a thread down? No one can post any rebuttals but less invasive than deletion and getting thrown into the "flame wars" folder.
User avatar
asianflava
8000 Club
8000 Club
 
Posts: 8412
Images: 45
Joined: Mon Aug 02, 2004 5:11 am
Location: CO, Longmont
Top

Postby Kankujoe » Mon Jul 16, 2007 4:29 pm

I know this is a heated topic in our country today and there is good justification for concern as Arne pointed out in his post.

My take on this topic is pretty well summed up by what Teddy Roosevelt wrote almost a century ago.

"Theodore Roosevelt on Immigrants and being an AMERICAN"

"In the first place we should insist that if the immigrant who comes here in good faith becomes an American and assimilates himself to us, he shall be treated on an exact equality with everyone else, for it is an outrage to discriminate against any such man because of creed, or birthplace, or origin. But this is predicated upon the man's becoming in very fact an American, and nothing but an American...There can be no divided allegiance here. Any man who says he is an American, but something else also, isn't an American at all. We have room for but one flag, the American flag, and this excludes the red flag, which symbolizes all wars against liberty and civilization, just as much as it excludes any foreign flag of a nation to which we are hostile...We have room for but one language here, and that is the English language...and we have room for but one sole loyalty and that is a loyalty to the American people."

If this is inflammatory then so be it. I believe most Americans feel pretty much the same way.
Joe

Ad-ven-ture: 1. an undertaking involving risk, unforeseeable danger, or unexpected excitement. 2. an exciting or remarkable experience. Trav-el-er: 1. one who seeks to experience their world. 2. one who seeks to be immersed in other cultures.
User avatar
Kankujoe
Adventure Traveler
 
Posts: 301
Images: 19
Joined: Sun Mar 04, 2007 1:30 am
Location: Missouri, West-Central - Out in the Woods
Top

Postby madjack » Mon Jul 16, 2007 5:17 pm

Rocky is right...it is time to let this one die...I know I participated in this thread but if your read it and see the difference in opinions and how fervently they are held, you should understand why we STRONGLY discourage posting of a political or religious nature............MJ
...I have come to believe that, conflict resolution, through violence, is never acceptable.....................mj
User avatar
madjack
Site Admin
 
Posts: 15128
Images: 177
Joined: Thu Dec 02, 2004 5:27 pm
Location: Central Louisiana
Top

Previous

Return to Off Topic

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest