Remote Control of Humans!

[TonyCooper]

An interesting read on where technology is heading! (pun intended)

http://www.breitbart.com/news/2005/10/27/D8DGNKD82.html

[goldcoop]

Coop,

SCARY! Ain't it!

Cheers,

Coop

[bledsoe3]

I need to get one of those to put on my wife. She really hates the shock collar.

[TonyCooper]

You are SOOO bad!

[toypusher]

I need to get one of those to put on my wife. She really hates the shock collar.

Ya, but aren't them inground (invisible) fences nice!

[bledsoe3]

All I can say is, I'm glad she doesn't read the stuff I write.

[Nitetimes]

The very low level of electricity required for the effect is unlikely to cause any health damage, Collins said. Still, NTT required me to sign a consent form, saying I was trying the device at my own risk.

"unlikely to cause any health damage" methinks maybe someone should look into this a bit further before they go strapping it on people. Somehow the idea of being electrocuted on any level really isn't that appealing.

But on the other hand, I could use one of those for my wife if you could make it work for that 'jaws flapping' syndrome.

The poskibilities boggle the mind.

[Cutterpup]

How come religion, sex and politics are off limits but you're allowing wife bashing????
"Pull the thread, Pull the thread, Pull the thread" with apologies to Bela Lugosi in Glen or Glenda.

Judy

[doug hodder]

Hey Cutterpup..(Judy), ....we're not suggesting banning husband bashing..that wasn't mentioned so we're (guys) still fair game...sorry...but my business involves a customer base that is 100% women, with the exception of one guy...I get it all day long, I can take it....as far as the politics..religion etc....it's like teaching a pig geometry....it wastes your time and annoys the pig...Doug