doug hodder
I like the 10/53 for personal reasons. Remember...there are always lanterns out there...it's no shame to let one go by once in a while. Did'ja get the bent one straightened?
teardrop_focus wrote:Thanks! Thanks very much... yeah, a bit of a lark, all this... but I do sincerely love these things. I'll never need this many all at once while camping, but I can certainly try! ...but only if it doesn't piss off the neighbors.
I'd always intended on bringing at least three or four along, though. That's why I started my collection w/ the little 200As. I thought they might be "softer" than the traditional dual-mantles, the 220s and 228s... but they're equally brilliant, so there goes that theory. The thinking was that w/ at least three burning in camp (placed in traingular formation) there'd be less dark shadows and less tripping over stuff. Either that or we just bring less beer. I forget.
The garage door in the pics is hidden from street view; no motorists were harmed in the light up. Dunno about any aircraft. Fortunately, all the lanterns were wearing their jaunty little hats.doug hodder
I like the 10/53 for personal reasons. Remember...there are always lanterns out there...it's no shame to let one go by once in a while. Did'ja get the bent one straightened?
Do you have a 10/53 lantern in your collection, sir? Inquiring minds'd like to know!
And, sadly; very sadly... no. I was not able to save the '67 228. Not only was it's fount rather tweaked, but the burner assembly was bent badly near the gen hole... and on top of that (literally) the porcelin vent had roughly 30% of it's porcelin banged off of it. Had the fount not been creased, I might've tried to straighten the burner's air tube and kept it alive. Putting it down was a hard thing to do... I wish I hadn't done it.
Thing is, though, that it offered it's internal organs so that other lanterns could live on and burn brighly in it's memory.
Return to Vintage Camping Equipment
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest