
The powerhouse is missing the generator and the tab for the cleaner is broken off.

This one fired up with the fuel in the tank.


I was making room for the new finds and knocked the 220a off the table, globe did not make it. Vent remains perfect.


Wolffarmer wrote:Kirt, no fare taking a gun to a flea market.
Great finds.
Is one of those a 285?
Randy
Wolffarmer wrote:The powerhouse probably is not a 285. I was just reading on the Collectors forum and it seems those are a good base to convert to kerosene.
![]()
I have ordered the parts needed to convert either a 200 or a 242 to kerosene. I am not sure which one I will do. I have 2 200A's that are just about perfect and a 1944 242 that is a real sweety. But the 242s seem to burn kerosene with less smell. And really I think mine burns gas better than the 200A's.
Who knows?
Randy
canned o minimum wrote:HOLY LITES A BLAZIN,Batman ! I go away fger a week and y'all post up EIGHT pages !
Kirk, Glad to see the 200a gang finally has sum guide lines and membership ! Sadly, "I" cannot post any pics of my collection on FIRE, cause I haven't refurbished em yet.
B'sides.. I jus got myself in trouble... my kid bought me a DO !! Now I'm DOomed ! Let the cast iron addiction BEGIN I jus bought sum biscuits to practice with....
starleen2 wrote:Question: Why the need for conversion to kerosene? I 'seen alot of conversions - but why? Is Kerosene less expensive per volume than Naptha? Just curious?
campmasterk wrote:starleen2 wrote:Question: Why the need for conversion to kerosene? I 'seen alot of conversions - but why? Is Kerosene less expensive per volume than Naptha? Just curious?
For me its just for the challenge and variety, I really dont know why. I would try to burn pancake syrup in one if they would do something cool like burn blue or red.
I quess I have heard that the kero burners tend to burn brighter?
Return to Vintage Camping Equipment
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests