Shadow Catcher wrote:If you keep the quality that you put into yours (or make it better) you should have a hit. I love the idea of the "trunk" but if you use the doors it will be somewhat of a visual mixed metaphor.
Classic Finn
Lil Swan Now A Registered & Licensed Brand Name-Finland
Question now. Since we no longer have the old Peugeot, but a Mazda 3 Hatchback. Its capable of pulling more: 550 kg unbraked and 1200kg braked.
With brakes - 1200kg - 2 645.54715 pounds
Without brakes - 550 kg.- 1 212.54244 pounds
Can I now have the axle set more back than on the old car? Im sort of confused with this..![]()
![]()
teardrop_focus wrote:Classic Finn
Lil Swan Now A Registered & Licensed Brand Name-Finland
Congratulations! I echo jackdaw's sentiments: "I'm so pleased for you . I know you'll make a great success , with your traditional / classic attention to detail..."
Question now. Since we no longer have the old Peugeot, but a Mazda 3 Hatchback. Its capable of pulling more: 550 kg unbraked and 1200kg braked.
With brakes - 1200kg - 2 645.54715 pounds
Without brakes - 550 kg.- 1 212.54244 pounds
Can I now have the axle set more back than on the old car? Im sort of confused with this..![]()
![]()
Setting the trailer axle farther back will increase tongue weight only.
The Mazda 3 is a fine chassis; it's the Ford C1 chassis shared with three marques: Ford Focus (2005 and later) and Focus C-Max... Volvo C30 S40 and V50... and Mazda 3... however I wouldn't want to add much additional tongue weight onto the back of a front-wheel-drive vehicle... Keep trailer tongue weight to the Euro (from what I understand) standard of 8% of the trailer loaded weight. (Granted, your customers will ultimately be responsible for how their teardrops are loaded for travel, but, you can know and advise them)
Again, Heikki, Congrats! and the very best of business luck to you!
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 10 guests