wincrasher wrote:you can already get this in a 12x12:
http://www.amazon.com/Paha-Que-12-Scree ... 742&sr=8-1
which 1 person can set up. suppose if it was scaled up to 20x20, it would be the same to set up - but would be alot taller.
not sure you'd get that much more out of it going that big. I'd try the 12x12 first and see how I liked it. Probably would do the same thing as you are thinking and be big enough.
mvperini wrote:yea you are crazy![]()
when we camp out here in the pacific nw we like state parks your canopy would not fit in most sites and what about the tie down ropes might as well add another 5 ft per side to stake it down now your set up is 30x30. you would need a truck to haul all the poles and tarps might as well buy motor home and add a screen room under the awning IMHO
and most teardrops are 4 ft and 5 and 6 ft wide very few are 7 ft. in fact i have never seen a 7 ft wide teardrop. anyway after building a teardrop why would you want to hide it under a tent
Mike
jerry101jlh wrote:Did I mention crazy idea? Point being is we spend a ton of money on multiple tents/screen rooms, and canopies when some enterprising tent company might be able to engineer one that fits all needs. My Paha Que screen room weighs in at 23 lbs according to Paha Que and is 10X10. Let's just double that for a 20X20 and add say 10 lbs for sturdier support poles, still only 56 lbs. That's not that bad.
Blotto Bros wrote:I think what's really being said here is "no market for said item" amongst teardropers. There are hundreds of shelters out there 20x20 and bigger...it can and has been done. I would think your real market would be flea market vendors...they would LOVE this!
jerry101jlh wrote:My Paha Que screen room weighs in at 23 lbs according to Paha Que and is 10X10. Let's just double that for a 20X20 and add say 10 lbs for sturdier support poles, still only 56 lbs. That's not that bad.
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 5 guests