Miriam C. wrote:I didn't post this to argue with you.
Seems to me we're discussing matters with an eye to reaching mutual understanding. That's my goal, anyway.
When you make statement like "Walmart not being a career choice" you are making a value judgement on people who didn't have your advantages. I just would like you and several others to give that some thought.
I believe I said very few people make it a career choice. This is not my opinion, it's a fact as proven by their high turnover rate - it's a rare employee that lasts longer than two years. But I certainly did NOT mean to belittle those who do make it a career choice. I would never belittle anyone willing to do honest work.
Your degree should have included Western Civ. and Eastern Civ.
Nope. But since you bring it up, here's what it did include:
Intro to Biology
Physical Anthropology
Physical Geology
Psychology
Sociology
Cultural Anthropology
Personal & Social Adjustment
US History
Intro to Political Science
Principles of Psychology
Educational Psychology
Social Psychology
Broadcast Tech (briefly considered being a DJ)
History of Art
Intro to Literature
Survey of English
German 1
German 2
Speech
Composition
Intermediate Algebra/Trigonometry
Health Ed
Intro to Statistics
This does not include my final year at SF State, but I guarantee there were no courses on Civilization, either Easten or Western. I did minor in Geology and took some Music Appreciation, but it was primarily psych-related courses.
I realize a lot of student don't do well in these subjects. With a degree in Pschology, perhaps you were taught that peoples choices cause thier lowly condition.
At San Francisco State?!!

As an adult you should be able to recognise that most service oriented capitalist countries are maintained by cheap labor and it is the very rich who keep that cheap labor in "it's place." I am of course assuming you took the usually rerequired courses in Economics as well.
There you go assuming again. No Economics whatsoever on my transcripts. Though if I had the time and money I'd love to take a few courses in it from Dr. Walter Williams at GMU. However, you miss one point about the service oriented labor situation. This is no longer the 19th century, nor is it China. No one is forced into a career choice and no one is forced to remain there. But change requires risk, and sadly, too many people are willing to stay in a bad situation than take the risk of getting out of it and going for something better. That applies not only to jobs but relationships and virtually every other aspect of human relations.
A young lady of my accquaintance is a very good example. She is a gifted and talented singer and has had a number of successful stage appearances. But she doesn't trust her gift and is terrified of rejection - she won't take the risk of getting an agent and going for the career that would make her happy and successful. Instead she drifts from dead-end job to dead-end job. For all practical purposes she is homeless save that various family members take her in on a sort of rotational basis. I can only pity her - I can't help her. She must do that for herself.
Sorry to miss the joke. I will do better.
No problem. I should have included at least a smiley.
Joseph