Trailer tongue question

Ask questions about Harbor Freight trailers, or questions about building your own...

Trailer tongue question

Postby KevinP » Fri Dec 18, 2009 10:38 am

I started rebuilding the front of the frame of my trailer last night (my neighbors enjoyed the "light show" from the grinder and welder) and have the main frame back together. The next task is adding the tongue back to it. I originally chose 2"x2"x.125 wall square tubing and was going to make the tongue ~ 32" long. After doing some readin and calculating I found out this was not going to be strong enough if I done a single tongue :cry: However, if I done an A-frame tongue it should be more than adequate for a tongue on paper. I'm wondering if I should put aside the tubing and try to locate some 2"x3"x.125 wall thick tubing?

Specs of the trailer are 5'x10' and highballing the weight of 2000lbs loaded.

For those who have built a larger TD what did you use for the tongue?

thanks......Kevin
KevinP
Teardrop Inspector
 
Posts: 18
Joined: Tue Nov 17, 2009 12:07 pm
Location: Nashville, TN

Postby Dale M. » Fri Dec 18, 2009 11:39 am

I used single 3x3 inch .120 (1/8 wall) steel tubing...... And it catches the first three frame cross members and is secured with triangle gussets at all contact points.... Forget length but I know its long enough the if I jackknife rig, bumper of truck does not hit front of trailer....

Dale
Last edited by Dale M. on Wed Dec 30, 2009 11:40 am, edited 1 time in total.
Lives his life vicariously through his own self.

Any statement made by me are strictly my own opinion.
You are free to ignore anything I say if you do not agree.

Image
User avatar
Dale M.
2000 Club
2000 Club
 
Posts: 2693
Images: 18
Joined: Thu Jun 09, 2005 8:50 pm
Location: Just a tiny bit west of Yosemite National Park

Tongue design

Postby eamarquardt » Fri Dec 18, 2009 12:02 pm

I'd go for the A frame style as it spreads the load over a greater area, can be welded to more frame members, and is connected closer to the corners of the frame where the frame is stronger. I've heard of single type tongues failing but never an A frame! My frame uses a combination of A Frame and central post and is overbuilt for sure. I wanted the rails on the outside and some support for a deck on the foretriangle. Also bored a hole in the central post and put the tongue jack right through it.

Image

Hope this helps.

Cheers,

Gus
The opinions in this post are my own. My comments are directed to those that might like an alternative approach to those already espoused.There is the right way,the wrong way,the USMC way, your way, my way, and the highway.
"I'm impatient with stupidity. My people have learned to live without it." Klaatu-"The Day the Earth Stood Still"
"You can't handle the truth!"-Jack Nicholson "A Few Good Men"
"Some people spend an entire lifetime wondering if they made a difference in the world. The Marines don't have that problem"-Ronald Reagan
User avatar
eamarquardt
Silver Donating Member
 
Posts: 3179
Images: 150
Joined: Sat Nov 11, 2006 11:00 pm
Location: Simi Valley, State of Euphoria (Ca)
Top

Postby KevinP » Fri Dec 18, 2009 4:36 pm

Thanks for the replies. I was planning on going back to where the second cross beam was (had to replace; twisted from the wreck) and form the A-frame at the hitch.

Gus....could I get a closer photo of where your A-frame intersects please? What hitch did you use? Was looking @ Tractor Supply during lunchand they had hitches for A-frame tongues @ $30 each when they had regular ones for $10. :thinking:
KevinP
Teardrop Inspector
 
Posts: 18
Joined: Tue Nov 17, 2009 12:07 pm
Location: Nashville, TN
Top

A-frame, Y-frame, or single tongue

Postby wattsworth » Mon Dec 28, 2009 9:23 am

Don't use the 2x2. It's probably not strong enough and may fatigue and crack after a while. Also, most couplers are more than 2" deep so your 2x2 tongue would swim inside the hitch coupler. The vertical dimension of the tongue increases strength in that direction as a cubic of the vertical measurement of the beam.

Your 2x2x.125 square tube is a only third the strength of 2x3x.125 on edge. It's also about a sixth the strength of a 2x4x.125 on edge. (for the engineers out there, this is from comparing the moment of inertia of the beam cross-sections).

A single 2x3 or 2x4 is easily stronger than two 2x2s used in an A-frame in the vertical, load carrying direction. Is either strong enough? For that, do some calculating using angib's page to guide you: http://www.angib.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/t ... tear84.htm

An A-frame or Y-frame tongue is stronger than a properly sized single beam only in the side direction -- ie if you had the trailer all hitched and pushed horizontally in the middle of the tongue. As far as tongue vertical loads, they are only as strong as putting your two tongue beams side by side. Since most failures happen due to vertical loads (weight on the trailer over bumps, dips, and washboard), a rectangular tube can easily be stonger in the direction that matters -- you'll have to do some calculating to find out.

Nobody wants to see their trailer go flying off the road due to a broken tongue. If you're going down hill at the time it fails, your trailer can really come back to haunt you.
wattsworth
Teardrop Inspector
 
Posts: 14
Images: 19
Joined: Thu Jun 04, 2009 7:28 pm
Location: Tehachapi, California
Top

Postby bobhenry » Mon Dec 28, 2009 10:07 am

I really like the way this one was built that "c" channel will hold what ever is thrown at it !

Image

Pretty sure it's Planovet's frame.
Growing older but not up !
User avatar
bobhenry
Ten Grand Club
Ten Grand Club
 
Posts: 10368
Images: 2623
Joined: Fri Feb 09, 2007 7:49 am
Location: INDIANA, LINDEN
Top

Postby planovet » Mon Dec 28, 2009 10:19 am

Yep, that's my frame. It's definitely a solid frame. Actually they overbuilt it but what could I do after the fact. They added some things that I didn't request because they thought I needed it. They had never built a trailer dedicated for a teardrop before. All in all it's a great frame and I'm glad how it turned out.
ImageMark (& Cindi)
Visit our website: Little Swiss Teardrop

I was wondering why the water balloon was getting bigger... and then it hit me.

ImageImageImageImage
User avatar
planovet
The Cat Man
 
Posts: 5583
Images: 3
Joined: Tue Nov 27, 2007 4:48 pm
Location: Plano, Texas
Top

Re: A-frame, Y-frame, or single tongue

Postby KevinP » Tue Dec 29, 2009 2:41 pm

wattsworth wrote:Don't use the 2x2. It's probably not strong enough and may fatigue and crack after a while. Also, most couplers are more than 2" deep so your 2x2 tongue would swim inside the hitch coupler. The vertical dimension of the tongue increases strength in that direction as a cubic of the vertical measurement of the beam.

Your 2x2x.125 square tube is a only third the strength of 2x3x.125 on edge. It's also about a sixth the strength of a 2x4x.125 on edge. (for the engineers out there, this is from comparing the moment of inertia of the beam cross-sections).

A single 2x3 or 2x4 is easily stronger than two 2x2s used in an A-frame in the vertical, load carrying direction. Is either strong enough? For that, do some calculating using angib's page to guide you: http://www.angib.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/t ... tear84.htm

An A-frame or Y-frame tongue is stronger than a properly sized single beam only in the side direction -- ie if you had the trailer all hitched and pushed horizontally in the middle of the tongue. As far as tongue vertical loads, they are only as strong as putting your two tongue beams side by side. Since most failures happen due to vertical loads (weight on the trailer over bumps, dips, and washboard), a rectangular tube can easily be stonger in the direction that matters -- you'll have to do some calculating to find out.

Nobody wants to see their trailer go flying off the road due to a broken tongue. If you're going down hill at the time it fails, your trailer can really come back to haunt you.


This is what I've been thinking and calculating since. I actually studies this prior and curretly to see what I should actually use for the tounge. From looking at the chart I will either use the 2"x3" channel in an A-frame or go up to 2.5"x2.5"x.250 wall tubing as a single tongue. Short wee at work and won't be able to order anything til next week.... :thinking:
KevinP
Teardrop Inspector
 
Posts: 18
Joined: Tue Nov 17, 2009 12:07 pm
Location: Nashville, TN
Top

Rectangular tube tonge

Postby wattsworth » Tue Dec 29, 2009 9:32 pm

Beam strength in bending doesn't go up very much for having thick-wall tube, but it does get a lot heavier. You might want to use 2x3 or 2x4 instead of the square 2.5x2.5x.25 just to save weight & cost. 3/16" wall makes stick welding easier. 1/8" wall is about the minimum if you are pretty good at stick welding.
wattsworth
Teardrop Inspector
 
Posts: 14
Images: 19
Joined: Thu Jun 04, 2009 7:28 pm
Location: Tehachapi, California
Top

Re: A-frame, Y-frame, or single tongue

Postby angib » Wed Dec 30, 2009 2:39 pm

wattsworth wrote:Your 2x2x.125 square tube is a only third the strength of 2x3x.125 on edge. (for the engineers out there, this is from comparing the moment of inertia of the beam cross-sections).

You're exaggerating the effect - I think you've only remembered half the formula for beam strength. It's not moment of inertia that determines strength but section modulus (that's moment of inertia divided by the maximum distance from the neutral axis - commonly abbreviated to I/y = Z).

So a 2x3x1/8 is 1.8 times as strong as a 2x2x1/8, not three times as strong.

wattsworth wrote:A single 2x3 or 2x4 is easily stronger than two 2x2s used in an A-frame in the vertical, load carrying direction.

A single 2x3 is not quite as strong as two 2x2s. But, yeah, a 4x2 is stronger, by about 40%.

Andrew
User avatar
angib
5000 Club
5000 Club
 
Posts: 5783
Images: 231
Joined: Fri Apr 30, 2004 2:04 pm
Location: (Olde) England
Top

Oops!

Postby wattsworth » Sat Jan 02, 2010 12:19 am

I should have carried the calculations further in my spreadsheet ... angib is right.
wattsworth
Teardrop Inspector
 
Posts: 14
Images: 19
Joined: Thu Jun 04, 2009 7:28 pm
Location: Tehachapi, California
Top

Postby asianflava » Sat Jan 02, 2010 1:02 am

I used 2x2x1/8 but felt that it wasn't strong enough, I ended up lopping 18in off for a little bit of insurance.

When I moved from TX to ATL, the trailer was loaded more than normal but still within my axle and tire limits. When I hit a rough section of road with bad expansion joints, the tongue broke. I had it towed to a trailer repair place and I wanted 2x3x3/16 installed instead. No one in town had any so they used 2x4x3/16. Way overkill but at least I don't have to worry about it anymore. I also had them put the 18in back when they put the new tongue on.
User avatar
asianflava
8000 Club
8000 Club
 
Posts: 8412
Images: 45
Joined: Mon Aug 02, 2004 5:11 am
Location: CO, Longmont
Top

Picture of tongue!

Postby eamarquardt » Sat Jan 02, 2010 1:48 pm

Just noticed the request for a better picture of my tongue. Here it is. Hope this helps.

Cheers,

Gus

Image
The opinions in this post are my own. My comments are directed to those that might like an alternative approach to those already espoused.There is the right way,the wrong way,the USMC way, your way, my way, and the highway.
"I'm impatient with stupidity. My people have learned to live without it." Klaatu-"The Day the Earth Stood Still"
"You can't handle the truth!"-Jack Nicholson "A Few Good Men"
"Some people spend an entire lifetime wondering if they made a difference in the world. The Marines don't have that problem"-Ronald Reagan
User avatar
eamarquardt
Silver Donating Member
 
Posts: 3179
Images: 150
Joined: Sat Nov 11, 2006 11:00 pm
Location: Simi Valley, State of Euphoria (Ca)
Top


Return to Trailer and Chassis Secrets

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests