robfisher wrote:Paul, I apologize to you as sincerely as a man could. My post was not meant to be directed at you although I can plainly see why you would feel the need to defend your position. I'm sorry.
I meant to direct my post to the bullies who pick on those who are natural targets. There are always those in any society who are targets for the bullies. The hits start coming as soon as the kid hits school age and it continues their entire life. Forums are no different. Most of us have never met each other outside of our forum persona. Forum bullies may be perfectly nice people in the real life world. They may not be. But to peck on another, instead of just putting them on ignore shows how small some people can become behind a keyboard.
Once again Paul, I'm sorry. You did what you had to do. I understand that. I also want to say thanks for moderating. You're way up there on my list for that one thing alone. I wouldn't have what it takes to do what you do. Thank You!
mary and bob wrote:From the thread title I thought it was about people with Aspergers, or do we believe Slow has it. One of our grandkids is diagnosed with Aspergers, and he is a very talented, nice, giving, sincere kid. I would describe him as a little quirky in that he can become obsessed with something, like a camera he has and can tell you everything about it, or he had a dislike of bugs for a while. A little hyper at times maybe, but really a great kid. He does get taken advantage of at times, mainly because he is trying to please others. And to add to his problems he has a severe peanut allergy, plus a few other allergies. Rumor is that Einstein had Aspergers, so you can't say people with it are less smart. Our grandkid explained it to us this way, "I see things different than other people do". And that may not be a bad thing.
Tamarack Lady wrote:Thank you, Rob.
I probably have no right to comment as I am merely a "lurker." I have no expertise to offer but do check-in daily.
However, in my humble opinion this thread is a most important one for the forum. It is setting a tone.
Was mike inappropriate sharing some of his "love life"? Of course. I simply skipped those. Did he talk about
his faith in his god? Yup. Again, optional reading for me. As for his enflaming thread...I felt he was "set up" for that...and the bullies won. Again, my opinion.
What mike brought often were questions where peoples' responses showed varied solutions..or made one think. He kept the forum active. He commented positively on others' ideas. And he was a "true believer" in teardrop camping.
I believe Mike is intelligent but struggles with socialization issues. How do we respond? I would choose compassion and understanding. What will the people of this forum choose?
Wendy
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests