It's time for a new Generic Standy Design...

General Discussion about almost anything Teardrop or camping related

Postby MOKI SEAKER » Thu Jun 14, 2007 1:14 pm

Just my 2 cents I would think a T@B clone with a drop floor would work..Jim :roll: :roll:
If you don’t read the newspaper, you are uninformed.. If you do read the newspaper. You are misinformed.
Mark Twain
User avatar
MOKI SEAKER
The 300 Club
 
Posts: 465
Images: 41
Joined: Thu Oct 12, 2006 5:50 pm
Location: UTAH, Kearns

Postby Elumia » Thu Jun 14, 2007 1:29 pm

re; weight:

Most older canned hams were made with 2x2 framing with exterior aluminium skin only on the outside, 1/8" ply on the inside.
The old 1970 trotwood pictured below I am working on was supposed to be 800 lbs.

base is approx 115", 84" wide. about 6' standing height inside. No bathroom. it is most comparable to a shasta compact. Inside had a dinette across the back that would work out from the door back to the end. it could have been configured to be 2 2' twins or a dropped table to make a king size bed. a fold out 4' bunk above. kitchen across the front with a 2' x 3-4' closet - could have put in a portapotty if you wanted to remove shelving. door is only 21" floor is 2x4 perimeter. plywood rests on main frame while 2x4's rest on angle iron that is attached below frame. deck was only 1/2" I replaced it w/5x8" tounge and groove plywood intended for subflooring. it is plenty strong. the widest is spans is between the main frame members which is probably 3 to 3-1/2 feet. I am considering dropping the floor to gain some headroom (I'm 6'4, but I still won't really be able to stand so I'm not sure it is worth the effort.

Part of the reason people want a bigger trailer is to sleep more than 2.

I think most teadrops are a bit overbuilt, but don't suffer too much weight penalty because of their small size. If you build a small camper like you build a TD, it will be too heavy for a prebuilt trailer. Anything over 1500 lbs should also have brakes. Even built with such flimsy materials, you will find many of these old trailer still serviceable after 30-40 years if they have been looked after to prevent leaks. water seepage (and interior condensation) causes the interior framing to rot.

Most bigger trailers were more self contained in terms of water systems as well. mine at one time surely had a water tank (was missing but fill is there)


Image
User avatar
Elumia
500 Club
 
Posts: 641
Images: 15
Joined: Tue Jan 17, 2006 2:02 am
Location: Napa, CA

Postby DougH » Thu Jun 14, 2007 1:29 pm

My build is going to be about 1/2 way between this and a tear. A rough Benroy profile about 54-56" height and 5' wide 8' long. A couch/bed lengthwise against one wall and a fold down table from the other. No rear galley but last 18-24" will be storage, top half accessible from inside and bottom from outside.
Main goal is to have enough height to sit comfortably inside, not worried about standing full height. Past experience shows little need to be able to cook inside but do want a place to get out of bad weather.
User avatar
DougH
Teardrop Master
 
Posts: 216
Images: 86
Joined: Tue Sep 05, 2006 12:17 am
Location: Concord CA
Top

Postby rmclarke » Thu Jun 14, 2007 1:32 pm

Wow....I really like this thread so far. This is just what I have been dreaming/planning about (except in a 5 1/2 x 10 1/2 size and without the shower) I've been toying with a sort of fliptop retro Sunspot
http://tnttt.com/album_ ... c_id=22601
until Mike said:
For this design I think I want to avoid pop up tops, as they make things way too complex.
:(
Need to reconsider....again :lol:
I'm gonna watch this thread with much interest because the final plans could always be..um...tweaked by the end user, right ? :twisted:

Richard
"When a hammer is the only tool you own, every problem begins to look like a nail..."

ImageFrom this: Image to this: Image Finally!!
User avatar
rmclarke
The 300 Club
 
Posts: 384
Images: 231
Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2007 3:22 am
Location: North Jefferson State
Top

Postby steve wolverton » Thu Jun 14, 2007 1:40 pm

The T@B clone, (Midget, Tidget, Widgets) are great looking campers. If we're trying to maximize the storage space (people + gear) it seems like a box would be the best shape. Most people seem to be attracted to the tear/canned ham shapes, so it now becomes how much space do you want to cut-off the corners to get the nice shape? Everyone wants to have a nice looking camper, so how much should looks play in the design as compared to functionality?

Elumia - Cool litle camper :thumbsup:
�veni, vidi, vici.�
User avatar
steve wolverton
1000 Club
1000 Club
 
Posts: 1676
Images: 11
Joined: Sun Nov 07, 2004 9:39 pm
Location: Brazoria, TX
Top

Postby apratt » Thu Jun 14, 2007 1:48 pm

What I would want in a small trailer would be....
Bed for 2 or 2 twin bed (32").
Small stove and sink.
A bathroom no smaller than 32" wide and 36" deep, shower would be opintional.
A dinette for 2.
Arthur,

ASL spoken here
User avatar
apratt
Gold Donating Member
 
Posts: 966
Images: 16
Joined: Fri Feb 24, 2006 11:43 pm
Location: Washington, Chehalis
Top

Postby mikeschn » Thu Jun 14, 2007 2:04 pm

Richard, What if the design allowed for a trolly top, so one could make the trolly top as tall as desired... depending on the height of the builder.

Steve, sounds like there's a trade off between looks and storage as well...

Del, the custom bolt together has potential too. I wonder what our resident engineer thinks?

Fornesto, What if half of the back was an outside galley, and the other half was an inside bathroom. The door to the trailer would be behind the wheel instead of in front, and the bed would be at the front of the trailer. that gets us back to an 11' long trailer.

Mike...
The quality is remembered long after the price is forgotten, so build your teardrop with the best materials...
User avatar
mikeschn
Site Admin
 
Posts: 19202
Images: 475
Joined: Tue Apr 13, 2004 11:01 am
Location: MI
Top

Postby steve wolverton » Thu Jun 14, 2007 2:09 pm

mikeschn wrote:Steve, sounds like there's a trade off between looks and storage as well...


Here's another idea, why don't people use the space on the tongue part of the camper construction too? I've seen a large RV that was built all the way out to the hitch of the frame. Instead of putting a storage box on the tongue, we could use that space for the camper body as well. :thinking:
�veni, vidi, vici.�
User avatar
steve wolverton
1000 Club
1000 Club
 
Posts: 1676
Images: 11
Joined: Sun Nov 07, 2004 9:39 pm
Location: Brazoria, TX
Top

Postby SaGR » Thu Jun 14, 2007 2:19 pm

steve wolverton wrote:Here's another idea, why don't people use the space on the tongue part of the camper construction too? I've seen a large RV that was built all the way out to the hitch of the frame.


Short turning radius (or backing at least)?
Building a small bowtop Vardo
Build thread: http://tinyurl.com/yk4hnmd

Generic Benroy: Sold to FIL/MIL
User avatar
SaGR
The 300 Club
 
Posts: 487
Images: 21
Joined: Fri May 25, 2007 9:29 am
Location: Illinois, Lisle
Top

Postby steve wolverton » Thu Jun 14, 2007 2:27 pm

SaGR wrote:
steve wolverton wrote:Here's another idea, why don't people use the space on the tongue part of the camper construction too? I've seen a large RV that was built all the way out to the hitch of the frame.


Short turning radius (or backing at least)?


Not if you follow the triangle of the tongue, it (the camper) wouldn't stick out further than the trailer.
�veni, vidi, vici.�
User avatar
steve wolverton
1000 Club
1000 Club
 
Posts: 1676
Images: 11
Joined: Sun Nov 07, 2004 9:39 pm
Location: Brazoria, TX
Top

Postby Kankujoe » Thu Jun 14, 2007 2:33 pm

Sounds to me that the further you progress into the design characteristics of a TTT or mega-TD the closer you come to a box or v-nosed box body style and then you come pretty close to converting a standard "off-the-shelf cargo trailer. And it seems that this option may even be less expensive & a whole lot faster.
Joe

Ad-ven-ture: 1. an undertaking involving risk, unforeseeable danger, or unexpected excitement. 2. an exciting or remarkable experience. Trav-el-er: 1. one who seeks to experience their world. 2. one who seeks to be immersed in other cultures.
User avatar
Kankujoe
Adventure Traveler
 
Posts: 301
Images: 19
Joined: Sun Mar 04, 2007 1:30 am
Location: Missouri, West-Central - Out in the Woods
Top

Postby SaGR » Thu Jun 14, 2007 2:38 pm

True enough Steve, I stand corrected. When I read it I thought you meant a flat front.

I think KJ hit the spot there :)
Building a small bowtop Vardo
Build thread: http://tinyurl.com/yk4hnmd

Generic Benroy: Sold to FIL/MIL
User avatar
SaGR
The 300 Club
 
Posts: 487
Images: 21
Joined: Fri May 25, 2007 9:29 am
Location: Illinois, Lisle
Top

Postby packerz4 » Thu Jun 14, 2007 2:44 pm

i like steve's idea. kinda like the puffin. a box for the maximum amount of room. drop floor optional, and small rounded edges so it doesn't look totally like a box.

making a good generic TTT plan is good, and preserves the integrity of the hard-core teardrop fans. (smooch to Gage) :R

that's what i'm planning for #2 someday. but then again, my #1 is a box too, just a short one with an interior height of 4.5 feet.


mike, looking forward to some sketches! i didn't notice, why can't you build for a few months? i'll go back and read the entire thread when i get home.

:applause:
tk
~ Go Packers! ~
www.2bagalot.com
User avatar
packerz4
Donating Member
 
Posts: 605
Images: 53
Joined: Mon Mar 19, 2007 7:57 pm
Location: Elcho, WI
Top

Postby caseydog » Thu Jun 14, 2007 2:55 pm

I think you could do a pass-thru galley if you put the galley in the back, and bed in the front. Here is a quick doodle with a seat that folds out to make a bed. You would need to go 6-wide for this layout, or make the cusions extend to sleep longitudinally instead of transverse, as drawn.

Boxing off the shape some would help with the pass-thru galley and storage above the bed.

CD

Image
Image

My build journal is HERE
User avatar
caseydog
Platinum Donating Member
 
Posts: 12420
Images: 515
Joined: Tue Jan 16, 2007 1:44 pm
Top

Postby Elumia » Thu Jun 14, 2007 3:16 pm

problem with a pass thru galley is - if you design for proper inside counter height it is too tall for outside and vice versa.
User avatar
Elumia
500 Club
 
Posts: 641
Images: 15
Joined: Tue Jan 17, 2006 2:02 am
Location: Napa, CA
Top

PreviousNext

Return to General Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests