angib wrote:Fenlason wrote:how come they "can't" build cars that get better mileage?
They can. But you won't buy them (or at least the average motorist won't).
Compare your 76 Subaru (first) with a base 2008 Impreza (second):
Engine, cc: 1600, 2500 +56%
Weight, pounds: 1885, 3060 +60%
Length, in: 157.5, 180.3 +14%
Height, in: 54.7, 58.1 +6%
Width, in: 59.4, 68.5 +15%
So the weight's gone up 60% (partly because it's a bigger car, but also because it's safer) and the frontal area's gone up 22%, though that's offset by about the same reduction in drag coefficient.
If you want to see just how much bigger your vehicle is today, just look at the same comparison between your 76 Subaru and a current car that you might consider 'tiny', a Honda Fit/Jazz:
Engine, cc: 1600, 1500 -7%
Weight, pounds: 1885, 2430 +29%
Length, in: 157.5, 157.4 +/-0%
Height, in: 54.7, 60.0 +10%
Width, in: 59.4, 66.2 +11%
Yup, that 'tiny' Fit is a bigger car in almost every way - I bet like me, you wouldn't have guessed that it was the same length as the sedan Subaru.
Here in Yurp we can get cars one size below the Fit (so about the size of a 70s Civic) and a friend uses a diesel one for a 25 mile commute where he's getting 52-54 mpg (in US gallons, measured on complete tankfuls).
Andrew
Sorry Andrew I missed your post. [maybe you were writing while I was.]
I knew my Subaru was small... definately smaller than a current Impreza.
but thank you for the numbers. Newer cars or at least probably most of them are safer than my 70's coupe. The new cars last longer also.. yet I do not know if that affects the weight.
I strongly suspect that the Prius is sportier than my old Subaru... but that car and the Smart car is marketed to those that mileage is an important factor... or is it just so they can appear to care?? [I don't know]
Here in the state of Maine.. we can't buy the smaller diesels

glenn
