jss06 wrote:brian_bp wrote:jss06 wrote:Leaf sprung axles will carry a load better then the torsens and will last longer.
I don't know what is meant by an axle carrying a load "better", so I don't know how to respond to that. As for lifespan, owners of moulded fiberglass travel trailers (which have traditionally had rubber-sprung axles) seem to find about a quarter-century to be a reasonable lifespan for the rubber, and that's likely enough.
...
As for the axles- how much weight do you carry on that trailer and over what type of terrain. It looks like its primarily off-road which means you want to build a trailer that can carry the weight you need and still survive in the condition it was being used. this is why i recommened leaf sprung axles. You can get heavier axles and the leafs will carry a load better then torsen especially if you are cycling the suspension regularly.
Why do you think heavy duty pickups still come with leaf sprung rear axles when coils ride and handle better.
Yes, torsion axles will get the job done. I just don't feel they are up to the type of abuse they will probably see.
I know that an answer was probably not expected to the highlighted question, but I just noticed it and think an answer is appropriate...
I think pickups have leaf springs because they are
cheap. I notice that heavy highway trucks typically don't have leaf springs anymore, and the coils have been used in some heavy-duty vehicles - including the Unimog and a number of military designs - for a long time. For military examples, look at the HMMWV (the real Hummer) and the
Heavy Expanded Mobility Tactical Truck (HEMTT).
In pickups the leaf springs obviously work adequately, but to me they seem to be there to meet a cost target, not a durability requirement.
Of course, the coil-versus-leaf question is not the same as the rubber-versus-steel question. I'm sure rubber springs do have a more limited cycle life than steel, although it's hard for me to see that being an issue for a recreational trailer... maybe it is.