by wannabefree » Thu Apr 09, 2009 9:31 pm
Wlooper -
It's just that most modern chargers work that way. There are several ways to control the charging of a battery, the simplest being to insert a series resistor between a simple rectifier/filter (as you cited in the wiki link) and the battery. This has been done for many, many years. While it is simple, it is neither cheap nor the best way to charge a battery. Transformers contain lots of iron and copper. Copper has gotten quite expensive and iron is heavy, so this approach has fallen out of favor for battery chargers.
Modern chargers monitor the voltage of the battery and the charging current, and limit them by pulsing the charge voltage applied to the battery. Some even monitor the temperature of the battery and adjust the charge rate accordingly. This closed-loop charging has the advantage of lengthening battery life while also permitting faster charging.
I made some assumptions about the charger. On the other hand, old-style transformer/rectifier/filter charges regularly skimped on the filtering (many not filtering at all), relying on the battery to filter the power. This works, but isn't necessarily friendly to modern electronics. Both a poorly filtered power supply or a pusling charger can have negative effects on electronics. Not necessarily harmful but it can noticibly affect performance.
After saying all that there are some specifics that can prove it all wrong. Cars charge their batteries directly off the alternator with no filtering. All the electronics in cars work just fine, but they're designed to work in that environment. Wiis aren't, necessarily. So it all comes back to do you want to risk toasting your Wii or spend $20 on a car cord? The Wii is probably very robust and can survive a car environment just fine, but I wouldn't recommend anyone try it because it's not my Wii.
In anything at all, perfection is finally attained not when there is no longer anything to add, but when there is no longer anything to take away.
-- Antoine de Saint-Exupery