caseydog wrote:doug hodder wrote:I'd kill for that sedan....check the stainless details on the fenders...and all the nice heavy plated chrome + a back seat you could get lost in. A door that goes thud when you close it! I was born in the wrong generation. What's not to like on either one of these beauties?...and don't anyone give me any fuel mileage crap! CD, you are very fortunate to have the opportunity to see and photograph vehicles like this, without all the maddening crowds of a car show! Doug
The sedan is called a Barrel Back, and this was one of 16 of them built in 1942. This is one of the few remaining. It is stunning.
However, I shoot mostly classics, and the ones I shoot are restored to a condition that is WAY above what the originally were when they came out of the factory. Fit and finish and paint quality on a good restoration is 50 times better than the original.
When I hear the words, "They just don't build them like this anymore," my response is that they NEVER built them like this.
These old cars are beautifully designed, and I love them. But, there is something to be said about today's cars, and their ability to start everyday in cold weather, go more that 50,000 without an engine overhaul, and not rust away in five years.
I loved my old GTO, but my current car is just as fast, and when I hit the brakes, it stops.![]()
I would love to own a classic like that Barrel Back, as long as I don't have to drive it to work everyday.![]()
CD
Interesting to hear you say that they "never built them like this"....my daughter who has a degree in "Antique Automotive Restoration" from McPherson College, Kansas, always reminds me of this when I work on my old car.....as she says "I try to over-restore" as do most people when working on their classic cars....but you want it looking good...right?
Philip