d30gaijin wrote:Caseydog,
Thank you for your response.I am converting a 6'x10' cargo; would your response apply equally to a slightly larger living area?
Again, thank you for your response it is truly appreciated.
Don
Engineer Guy wrote:R Factor effectiveness ratios are simple math generally. R 6.5 Foam has ~62% better heat- or cold-stopping effectiveness [resistance to energy transfer] than R 4.0. R 6.5 is ~45% more efficient than R 4.5. Any R Factor listed has the fine print of test conditions. All Insulations are installation-dependent and imperfect typically...
Engineer Guy wrote:From your Forum moniker, I take it you've been to Japan also and experienced their uninsulated, thin wall cold spaces perhaps? ;-0
astrotrailer wrote:I just got back from a 4 night astronomy party in northern California with my wife.
I insulated my 5x8 trailer last year with 1 inch white rigid foam board in the side walls and
between the ribs below the roof. I also added 1 inch closed cell foam below the ribs to
make it softer on my head when I forgot to duck. I put 2 inch white foam board under
the deck and covered it with fiberglass reenforced plastic. The inside floor, ramp door and
side walls have 1/2 inch closed cell foam over the plywood and are covered in carpet.
Trackstriper wrote:Back to blue vs. pink, they are both extruded polystyrene and I doubt there is any significant r-value difference between the brands. The expanded white bead board has a lower r-value, maybe around 4 per inch of thickness, and the foil faced polyisocyanurate foam is somewhat better than the extruded insulation. The extruded product, either blue or pink, will serve you well...they are durable and don't break up into a jazillion little uncontrollable beads while cutting like the bead board does. The polyiso is nice if you can find it in the right thickness.
Helpful links:
http://www.glacierbay.com/Instresult.asp
http://www.glacierbay.com/gbInsultest.asp
Return to Cargo Trailer Conversions
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests