Rough roads in places like National Forest dirt roads, washboard surfaces, BLM roads. Not "off-roading."
I just want to have enough ground clearance under my TTT so that I can take it to out-of-the-way places for photography, fishing, and camping. The critical point, I believe, is under the rear bumper where, with the Dexter #9 axle at zero degrees orientation and 13-inch tires, the ground clearance is approximately 9 inches.
I have the possibility of getting a Dexter #9 with 10 degrees of upward orientation, which would lower the ground clearance to 8 inches and give me another inch to add to the interior ceiling height.
So, the question is: Is it safe and prudent to go with the 10-degree upward orientation and have an 8-inch ground clearance at the rear for the kind of road travel I've described?
In thinking about the problem, I set up a simple seesaw diagram where the distance from the rear bumper to the hitch ball is 174 inches and the fulcrum, the position of the axle is 69 inches from the rear. Ignoring the slight differences due to arcs about the fulcrum, each inch of upward displacement at the hitch ball would reduce the ground clearance at the bumper by 0.657 inches.
So, with 9 inches of clearance, the hitch ball would have to rise 13.7 inches before the bumper would scrape the ground. Alternatively, using the upwardly angled axle adjustment, with 8 inches of clearance, the hitch ball would have to rise 12.2 inches before scraping.
It seems to me that 12 inches of upward bump at the hitch ball is way beyond reason on even the bumpiest of roads so it would seem okay to go with the lower-height axle.
What do those of you with infinitely more experience with this subject than I think?
Thanks in advance for your guidance.