aggie79 wrote:A Sawstop may help to keep fingers from getting cut, but it does nothing for the other type of tablesaw accident - boards kicking back toward the operator.
I have a "Crapsman" hybrid saw with a Biesmeyer fence. Even though it doesn't go "out of tune" I check the blade, miter slot and fence alignment every six months or so. The stock blade guard is crap so it went into the trash and was replaced by a Sharkguard blade splitter. I keep my blades clean and sharp and at the right height for cutting. I use a cross-cut sled for 90 degree panel cuts. And, as Danny said, proper stance - to the side - is also crucial to not get hurt when kickback occurs.
My 2 cents worth.
rbeemer wrote:while Saw-stop shows good potential, I would not have one because I think there is a better way. Keeping your awareness that a saw is a dangerous device is the best safety device there is: YOU USE IT AT YOUR OWN RISK!!!!.
What SAW STOP does that is good is to drop the sawblade down from the cutting surface. There is no reason to stop the blade using aluminum blocks rammed into the teeth of the blade, if the saw blade is out of the way. Remember also you cannot cut green or wet wood with this saw because it will invoke the safety device. I have not seen this saw run in a area with high humidity either.
The idea of saw-stop is good and bad because it give people a false sense of security that nothing bad will happen to them if they make a mistake and that is not good.
Yota Bill wrote:those examples are extremely far-fetched..ah, come on now, where is your sense of humor ,,.and who said this device should be government mandated? It has been suggested that the owner of the technology has supported the government/courts doing so. I realize the owner of the patent wanted that, but it doesnt work that way (he would have to release the patent if it were required to be installed by the manufacturer)
I don't think that if the government somehow mandated that saw stop technology be required on all new table saws the fellow would be required to relinquish his patent rights. I'd be interested if there is a requirement that he be forced to abdicate his rights.
take it from someone who is surounded by multiple safety devices on most every job, the device is suplimental and does not make the user complacent
Return to Teardrop Construction Tips & Techniques
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests