Optimized Winter Warrior O.W.W. OWW

...ask your questions in the appropriate forums BUT document your build here...preferably in a single thread...dates for updates, are appreciated....

Postby aggie79 » Thu Dec 22, 2011 9:46 am

Thanks for reposting the drawings, Mike. I can see advantages to both.

myoung wrote:I'm curious, Mike. What is the overall height opened and closed?


Good question, Mike. Garage clearance - height and length - plus shower and toilet are my design parameters.

myoung wrote:Seems like a lot of work for a foot or two.


It does seem like a lot of work. That is why I rotate between these and a version of the Compact like yours, Mike. Accomodating a shower in the Compact is what trips me up.

Take care Mike and Mike,
Tom
Tom (& Linda)
For build info on our former Silver Beatle teardrop:
Build Thread

93503
User avatar
aggie79
Super Duper Lifetime Member
 
Posts: 5405
Images: 686
Joined: Tue Aug 07, 2007 5:42 pm
Location: Watauga, Texas

Postby myoung » Thu Dec 22, 2011 9:58 am

RAYVILLIAN wrote:Don't know about Alto but both of my WW are 77" when up and 60" when down. It is abit of work for just 2' but it sure does make a difference comfort wise. Being able to stand up to pull your pants up and having room to take wet clothes off where it is warm and dry is wonderful. Guess I'm getting old and soft.

Gary


Six-foot five-inches of interior height is quite a bit. Do you think it would make much difference to simply have a standee with the height you want and eliminate the extra pivoting section and possible weather/dust sealing issues the may be involved? The aerodynamic difference would be minimal, it would seem.
Mike Young
build thread: viewtopic.php?t=40459
User avatar
myoung
500 Club
 
Posts: 644
Images: 250
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2010 11:21 am
Location: Nipomo, CA

Postby RockyMountainTeardrops » Thu Dec 22, 2011 11:31 am

mikeschn wrote:And I've concluded that an exterior membrane is a requirement for any RV. So that means I have to use either fiberglass with polyester resin, or canvas with glue or paint.

Is that the conclusion you guys are coming to also?

Mike...


Mike, polyester resin is not suitable to be used over plywood.
Boat building forum-Protecting plywood with polyester
A Google search will come up with many more examples.
I researched this pretty heavily when I was coming up with my design of the "Test Mule" and the only answer I found was using suitable core material, either PVC foam, urethane foam, or balsa.
User avatar
RockyMountainTeardrops
Super Teardrop Manufacturer
 
Posts: 99
Images: 233
Joined: Fri Oct 22, 2010 1:28 pm
Location: 4,000 above Denver, CO
Top

Postby starleen2 » Thu Dec 22, 2011 1:30 pm

myoung wrote:
RAYVILLIAN wrote:Don't know about Alto but both of my WW are 77" when up and 60" when down. It is abit of work for just 2' but it sure does make a difference comfort wise. Being able to stand up to pull your pants up and having room to take wet clothes off where it is warm and dry is wonderful. Guess I'm getting old and soft.

Gary


Six-foot five-inches of interior height is quite a bit. Do you think it would make much difference to simply have a standee with the height you want and eliminate the extra pivoting section and possible weather/dust sealing issues the may be involved? The aerodynamic difference would be minimal, it would seem.


it does make a difference - when towing the ladybug in the up position - you could "feel" the drag. The collapsible design also makes it garagable. The hinge and side seals were never an issue with the lady bug - similar design - Its first outing was towed two hours in a driving rain all the way to the campsite!
User avatar
starleen2
5th Teardrop Club
 
Posts: 16272
Images: 224
Joined: Sat May 12, 2007 8:26 pm
Location: Pea Ridge ,AR
Top

Postby bdosborn » Thu Dec 22, 2011 1:47 pm

starleen2 wrote:
myoung wrote:
RAYVILLIAN wrote:Don't know about Alto but both of my WW are 77" when up and 60" when down. It is abit of work for just 2' but it sure does make a difference comfort wise. Being able to stand up to pull your pants up and having room to take wet clothes off where it is warm and dry is wonderful. Guess I'm getting old and soft.

Gary


Six-foot five-inches of interior height is quite a bit. Do you think it would make much difference to simply have a standee with the height you want and eliminate the extra pivoting section and possible weather/dust sealing issues the may be involved? The aerodynamic difference would be minimal, it would seem.


it does make a difference - when towing the ladybug in the up position - you could "feel" the drag. The collapsible design also makes it garagable. The hinge and side seals were never an issue with the lady bug - similar design - Its first outing was towed two hours in a driving rain all the way to the campsite!


The pop up design is wonderful for us, for all the reasons given above. I'd build another one without giving is a second thought. FWIW, we have 72" from the floor to the roof in ours, which is plenty for us but Jean and I are both 5'6".

Bruce
2009 6.5'X11' TTT - Boxcar
All it takes is a speck of faith and a few kilowatts of sweat and grace.
Image
Boxcar Build
aVANger Build
User avatar
bdosborn
Donating Member
 
Posts: 5594
Images: 806
Joined: Wed May 05, 2004 11:10 pm
Location: CO, Littleton
Top

Postby myoung » Thu Dec 22, 2011 1:58 pm

starleen2 wrote:it does make a difference - when towing the ladybug in the up position - you could "feel" the drag. The collapsible design also makes it garagable. The hinge and side seals were never an issue with the lady bug - similar design - Its first outing was towed two hours in a driving rain all the way to the campsite!


Certainly, fitting a trailer in a typical garage with an opening of about 82 inches makes sense and was the reason I opted for a pop-up. That said, I doubt that the rest of the configuration makes much of a difference at legal highway speeds. Intuition argues for a tapered rear section, but the reduction in turbulence doesn't amount to much worth bothering about unless you have a low-powered tow vehicle, I suppose. Beveling or rounding the top front edge helps, but most trailer designs have that feature without the extra contraptions involved in building a moveable shell.

Don't have a wind tunnel handy, but it would be interesting to see just how much drag decreases with the taper versus a square back or one with just a slight taper. If what you are looking for is a Kamm-effect tail, then the amount of taper need not be so great and the shape would be easier to achieve with fixed sides.

I'm 5'-8" and all it takes to stand up inside is a pop-up of six inches or so. That's pretty easy to do.

I suppose the aesthetic or artistic reasons count a great deal for the curves that most people prefer even on the larger, non-TD trailers.

There's something for every taste, which makes this such a wonderful activity. We all get to express ourselves thru our creations. That's terrific.
Mike Young
build thread: viewtopic.php?t=40459
User avatar
myoung
500 Club
 
Posts: 644
Images: 250
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2010 11:21 am
Location: Nipomo, CA
Top

Postby RAYVILLIAN » Fri Dec 23, 2011 8:42 am

Mike when it comes to the aerodynamics I can only tell you what my experience is. With the old WW that had a round teardrop front end I got 14 to 16 m mpg with the new WW with a chisel nose I get 15 to 17 mpg over the same roads with the same tow vehicle. The old one was 5' wide and 5' high the new one is 6' wide and 5' high when top is down and the new one is 400 lbs heavier. The new one's nose is the same height as the back of the truck and is only 3' wide.
This is the only Pic I have of the two of them together.

Image

Gary
Where ever we raise the hatch is home.
Darn blank states keep getting further away and we keep traveling slower ain't never gona get this map full.
111961Image
User avatar
RAYVILLIAN
Lifetime member
 
Posts: 1434
Images: 109
Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2004 9:33 pm
Location: Rayville MO
Top

Postby RAYVILLIAN » Fri Dec 23, 2011 8:48 am

Mike S
Have you ever considered boat upholstery material for the outside covering. Warpony and Darrin have used it on the tops of their woody's with good success and it's under $20 a yard

Gary
Where ever we raise the hatch is home.
Darn blank states keep getting further away and we keep traveling slower ain't never gona get this map full.
111961Image
User avatar
RAYVILLIAN
Lifetime member
 
Posts: 1434
Images: 109
Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2004 9:33 pm
Location: Rayville MO
Top

Postby mikeschn » Sat Dec 24, 2011 4:57 am

Okay, so if I go the fiberglass route, then one of these epoxies would work?

http://www.uscomposites.com/epoxy.html

Mike...
The quality is remembered long after the price is forgotten, so build your teardrop with the best materials...
User avatar
mikeschn
Site Admin
 
Posts: 19202
Images: 475
Joined: Tue Apr 13, 2004 11:01 am
Location: MI
Top

Postby RAYVILLIAN » Sat Dec 24, 2011 9:56 am

Mike
Sorry but Trudy and I both have to work this week.

On the resin I went with Marine epoxy on the first WW.

Gary
Where ever we raise the hatch is home.
Darn blank states keep getting further away and we keep traveling slower ain't never gona get this map full.
111961Image
User avatar
RAYVILLIAN
Lifetime member
 
Posts: 1434
Images: 109
Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2004 9:33 pm
Location: Rayville MO
Top

Previous

Return to Build Journals

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 17 guests