TJinPgh wrote:One could only hope that a trailer would be exempt from the emissions laws in CA.
But then, this is CA we're talking about. Probably second only to the federal government when it comes to inane rules and regulations. The fine folks who kept us from getting a pneumatic powered car because it didn't meet federal emissions requirements.
eamarquardt wrote:TJinPgh wrote:I read a bit about pneumatic cars and I'm "not entirely convinced" that the CARB requirements are responsible for the stillbirth of the pneumatic car. The CARB can save us Californians from ourselves, it cannot save the balance of the US's citizens from themselves. If the pneumatic car was such a good thing, the Feds and other 49 states would have lots of them running about giving off nothing but formerly compressed gas. Ain't so though.
Please don't take this overly seriously but it is all true to the best of my knowledge.
Cheers,
Gus
harleymsn wrote:I've read a bit about the pneumatic cars too and I didn't see anywhere that they couldn't pass emission standards. What I did learn was that the original design by DMI would not pass Safety standards as the whole car was GLUED together. Then Tata got the rights and talked about putting it in the Nano which also could not meet Safety standards and the gasoline engine in it would not pass emissions standards.
olds-cool wrote:TJ, I believe I forgot to mention that I had a bill of sale and was asked to do a vin rubbing as well. As someone above mentioned though, the registration card acts the part of a title since the state I bought from (VT) did not issue titles. In those states, that is your proof of ownership. Coincidently, I don't believe a single piece of paper I got from the seller had been notarized. I did a quick search for the correct forms on the DMV site this morning but as I'm at work couldn't take much time to do so.
TJinPgh wrote:harleymsn wrote:I've read a bit about the pneumatic cars too and I didn't see anywhere that they couldn't pass emission standards. What I did learn was that the original design by DMI would not pass Safety standards as the whole car was GLUED together. Then Tata got the rights and talked about putting it in the Nano which also could not meet Safety standards and the gasoline engine in it would not pass emissions standards.
Well, a car being glued together is hardly an issue, providing we are talking body panels.
At any rate, I would need to look at what Tata was doing. If the gasoline engine is used the same way as it was in the original design, then my comment stands. The engine, so far as I can recall, isn't used to drive the car. It's merely used to pump air into the tanks on the fly.
There should be no need to have it meet the same emissions controls as a standard engine.
[/quote]TJinPgh wrote:
Now, the question I have is, given your experience with the bike frame, where a bill of sale and registration (from a non-title state) was sufficient to get a title on the frame, would the bill of sale and trailer registration from Maine be sufficient to get a PA title on the trailer without getting the inspection.
As long as the required info is available (weight, etc) it would seem to make sense that it could be done the same way.
Anybody actually tried?
For those of you who have already went the Maine route, did any of you request a new vin for a homebuilt trailer or did you all use a pre-existing vin from a modified manufactured trailer?
olds-cool wrote:TJ, I believe I forgot to mention that I had a bill of sale and was asked to do a vin rubbing as well. As someone above mentioned though, the registration card acts the part of a title since the state I bought from (VT) did not issue titles. In those states, that is your proof of ownership. Coincidently, I don't believe a single piece of paper I got from the seller had been notarized. I did a quick search for the correct forms on the DMV site this morning but as I'm at work couldn't take much time to do so.
For those of you who have already went the Maine route, did any of you request a new vin for a homebuilt trailer or did you all use a pre-existing vin from a modified manufactured trailer?
Blotto Bros wrote:Congrats guys!!! Glad this worked so well for you.![]()
Your convict made plate comment reminded me of a sign that used to hang in a Denver DMV I went to.
"Writing a bad check for your license plates will lead to a career of making them"
KCStudly wrote:A wise friend of mine once taught me, "If something doesn't make sense, look at the money angle."
The states want their due, motorized or not. If they can collect fees they will not want you circumnavigating that and sending your money out of state. A bigger issue is probably the local property taxes. My town gets several hundred dollars from me each year after adding up all of my registered vehicles, boat included (not so for Maine, as I have no property there, don't think they have property taxes)
Return to Essential Information about building teardrops
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests