Miriam C. wrote:Now if I only had a group hug emoticon.
I don't have one, but how about this? IF my nefarious plan for this pirated thread is successful, NO ONE will EVER mention WALMART on this forum AGAIN!
BWAHAHAHAHAA!
Will that do?
Joseph

Miriam C. wrote:Now if I only had a group hug emoticon.
And the words in the previous paragraph were Clinton's, not Bush's. My point being that if Bush lied, so did Clinton. In fact, neither one lied. Both believed faulty intelligence that we now, with our 20/20 hindsight, know was seriously flawed. But frankly, I don't expect liberals to have enough intellectual honesty to admit even that much.
President Bush, speaking to the nation this month about the need to challenge Saddam Hussein, warned that Iraq has a growing fleet of unmanned aircraft that could be used "for missions targeting the United States."
Last month, asked if there were new and conclusive evidence of Hussein's nuclear weapons capabilities, Bush cited a report by the International Atomic Energy Agency saying the Iraqis were "six months away from developing a weapon." And last week, the president said objections by a labor union to having customs officials wear radiation detectors has the potential to delay the policy "for a long period of time."
All three assertions were powerful arguments for the actions Bush sought. And all three statements were dubious, if not wrong. Further information revealed that the aircraft lack the range to reach the United States; there was no such report by the IAEA; and the customs dispute over the detectors was resolved long ago. --10.22.02, Washington Post
Joseph wrote:
Read it again. "Despite many efforts to locate and destroy Iraq's pre-Gulf War chemical munitions, filled and unfilled pre-Gulf War chemical munitions are deemed to still exist."
And the words in the previous paragraph were Clinton's, not Bush's. My point being that if Bush lied, so did Clinton. In fact, neither one lied. Both believed faulty intelligence that we now, with our 20/20 hindsight, know was seriously flawed. But frankly, I don't expect liberals to have enough intellectual honesty to admit even that much.
Joseph
PaulC wrote:In saying that, can you explain to me the meaning of the word "deemed" in the context in which it is used in the above quote.
Also, could you explain to me what they are saying when they state that "Despite many efforts to locate"
PaulC wrote:Apparently some have all the time in the world to sit at the computer and justify their existence. All the advice I can offer to them is to go out and get a life or, maybe, get out in the shop and build a TD
Joseph wrote:PaulC wrote:Apparently some have all the time in the world to sit at the computer and justify their existence. All the advice I can offer to them is to go out and get a life or, maybe, get out in the shop and build a TD
I'd love to, but unfortunately, some of us are condemned to spend the day chained to the computer in order to earn a living. This is my break. Pathetic, innit?
Joseph
PaulC wrote:Joseph, Why don't you adopt the true spirit of your avatar(minus the raping and pillaging
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 0 guests