Alan and Lianna wrote:Well, we may all be smarter than we think...
I cnduo't bvleiee taht I culod aulaclty uesdtannrd waht I was rdnaieg. Unisg the icndeblire pweor of the hmuan mnid, aocdcrnig to rseecrah at Cmabrigde Uinervtisy, it dseno't mttaer in waht oderr the lterets in a wrod are, the olny irpoamtnt tihng is taht the frsit and lsat ltteer be in the rhgit pclae. The rset can be a taotl mses and you can sitll raed it whoutit a pboerlm. Tihs is bucseae the huamn mnid deos not raed ervey ltteer by istlef, but the wrod as a wlohe. Aaznmig, huh? Yaeh and I awlyas tghhuot slelinpg was ipmorantt! See if yuor fdreins can raed tihs too.
So yes we are smaretr tahn we thnik...
Alan
Roly Nelson wrote:Alan, htat waz a creat poast and eye waz abel to reed everi bit uv it. It is amazin what the humen mind iz kapable of fokusin on. Sum ov us dont reel-ly under stand wat aktual korrect riting iz al aboutt. Sew, hear eye goe, stammeriln and clammering to make meyself under-stud. Sum of us jusst don hav the smartz to undurstand korrect pronunsurmation or speling of the ritten wurd. Thankx four yor klarilfikation of mutch of ar Englesh Languisch, it reely duzz my hart good. O, buy da weigh, kan eue explanne haue importnant it iz to spel korectli, and aktukally pronounse da wordz korrectly? Gud luk on yer explanation, I hain't god a klue wat eye am riting about, so help-my. Goood luk on yer persivationstuff. Hay, wat duz that meen anyway? Eye unerstand dat I may gradduatie from da tird grad sumtime nest yere, aftur 5 yers in da same grad, eye sur hop sew. O my God, mi hed iz beginning to hert.......Ahhhhh.
![]()
Aul mi luv and absulutely mutch mor of dat khind of stufff...........Roly ~~
It's funny, but we do read in shapes, not in letters. I learned that in college as an art major. Within limits, we really can read through mistakes, as long as the words fall into recognized patterns.
That being said, I sometimes encounter posts here, and on every other forum, that challenge my brain's ability to read shapes
Prem wrote:CaseyDog wrote:It's funny, but we do read in shapes, not in letters. I learned that in college as an art major. Within limits, we really can read through mistakes, as long as the words fall into recognized patterns.
That being said, I sometimes encounter posts here, and on every other forum, that challenge my brain's ability to read shapes
And then there are texting short-cuts. Even worse.
Alan and Lianna wrote:Well, we may all be smarter than we think...
I cnduo't bvleiee taht I culod aulaclty uesdtannrd waht I was rdnaieg. Unisg the icndeblire pweor of the hmuan mnid, aocdcrnig to rseecrah at Cmabrigde Uinervtisy, it dseno't mttaer in waht oderr the lterets in a wrod are, the olny irpoamtnt tihng is taht the frsit and lsat ltteer be in the rhgit pclae. The rset can be a taotl mses and you can sitll raed it whoutit a pboerlm. Tihs is bucseae the huamn mnid deos not raed ervey ltteer by istlef, but the wrod as a wlohe. Aaznmig, huh? Yaeh and I awlyas tghhuot slelinpg was ipmorantt! See if yuor fdreins can raed tihs too.
So yes we are smaretr tahn we thnik...
Alan
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 1 guest