Trackstriper wrote:eamarquardt wrote:Ya know, if this were happening to me I'd be calling them daily.....
Give em heck till they capitulate!!!!!!!
Gus, gotta love ya. But philosophically we might disagree..................
G'nite Gus.
Bruce
Never let it be said I'm not open to input. However:
Unless I'm not paying attention:
1) Sawyer called em (and spoke to the GM) and they "opined" that they didn't see any reason why one couldn't powder coat their assembly. To me that's a "good to go" to powder coat their product and not void a warranty. If Flexride suspected there might be an issue, then would have been the time to express it. I was taught, at considerable government expense), it's ok to say: "Sir (or Mam as the case might be), I do not know but I will find out", then do so, and report back.!
2) They have been "less than responsive" as they have been reached out to by member(s) of this forum and, to date, haven't provided a written/verbal or any response of any value (other than as noted below) as far as I can tell.
3) It has been suggested (I can't verify at this time that they changed their FAQ answers after the problem was called to their attention but let's for the moment assume they did) that they have updated their site to "cover their posteriors/tracks" without "paying" for the information that was provided them (as in powder coating can be a problem). Sneakly, cowardly, CS at best, IMHO.
4) Sawyer, surreptitiously, called again, inquired about powder coating their product and was AGAIN informed there wasn't an issue.
5) It appears that other torsion axles have been powder coated w/o any reported problems. Soooooo, what's changed and what responsibility does Flexride have when characteristics of their product change or they aren't in line with industry norms (as in other axles can be powder coated, why not theirs)? Should they be responsible for changing their policies and giving customers clear straight answers to their questions or should their customers bear the expense of finding out the limitations of Flexride's products with little to no help from Flexride?
I think when you sell a product you have a reasonable responsibility to know the limitations/performance envelope of your product. It appears that Flexride didn't know those limitations, has learned something at the expense of one of their customers, but is unwilling to share in the expense of this learning experience. There is always some "middle ground". The expense of making this situation right as a percentage of their budget is a pitance and I think that they ought to do the right thing and will be calling em on Monday to express my thoughts unless Sawyer requests that I keep my nose out of it.
Based on what has been shared to date, I think Sawyer performed reasonable "due dilligence" before and after powder coating his axle and wasn't give clear straight answers from Flexride, IMHO.
If Flexride thinks they are unfairly being maligned, bashed, blackmailed, etc. I'd like to see their thoughts on the matter and I don't see why there'd be a problem posting any reply of theirs on the forum.
That's my logic.
Cheers,
Gus